-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DNM] spike: Run e2e tests in paralel #76
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Moving to use ginkgo tool instead of go test. This is done in order to use the parallel ginkgo parameter that is not supported on "go test" tool. Signed-off-by: Ram Lavi <[email protected]>
In order to manage failed tests artifacts, the process# is added to the log file name. Signed-off-by: Ram Lavi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ram Lavi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ram Lavi <[email protected]>
@maiqueb looking at the e2e test failing, it seems like prior (and also after) to migration the primary UDN virt-launcher pod is not getting the appropriate network-status (logs):
Can we attribute this issue to the OVNK race you talked about? OR is it a new issue we need to check? |
It could be. You'll need to check the logs of the ovnkube-control plane and ensure that for that pod it failed to find the primary UDN network to be sure. |
I don't see any pod fails, but are you sure we should find a "pod fail"? I mean, it did find a primary network, it was just the wrong one.. In any case, this is very helpful, I've also asked on the race bug to know more information.. |
So that's what you need to find: when it returns the active network for the namespace, which one did it find ? It should have found the primary UDN, not the default one. Can you print the relevant log snippet ? |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR is running the e2e tests in parallel, as tests should be independent of each other.
The amount of threads depends on the number of CPUs available in the machine running the CI.
Running it on the PR should increase CI time, and potentially expose bugs.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note: