Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CNV-41844: Improve displaying sysprep section when creating Windows VMs #1956

Merged

Conversation

hstastna
Copy link

@hstastna hstastna commented May 20, 2024

📝 Description

Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-41844

Improve sysprep section in InstanceTypes tab while using existing sysprep: display ConfigMap name in one line with the used Pencil icon, omit unnecessary Selected sysprep string in this section.

🎥 Screenshots

Before:
Not as nicely readable Sysprep section:
s_before

After:
s_after

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented May 20, 2024

@hstastna: This pull request references CNV-41844 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

📝 Description

Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-41844

Improve sysprep section in InstanceTypes tab while using existing sysprep: display sysprep name in one line with the used Pencil icon, omit unnecessary Selected sysprep string in this section.

🎥 Screenshots

Before:
Not as nicely readable Sysprep section:
s_before

After:
s_after

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from vojtechszocs and yaacov May 20, 2024 15:52
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved This issue is something we want to fix label May 20, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented May 20, 2024

@hstastna: This pull request references CNV-41844 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

📝 Description

Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-41844

Improve sysprep section in InstanceTypes tab while using existing sysprep: display configmap name in one line with the used Pencil icon, omit unnecessary Selected sysprep string in this section.

🎥 Screenshots

Before:
Not as nicely readable Sysprep section:
s_before

After:
s_after

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Improve sysprep section in InstanceTypes tab while using existing
sysprep: display ConfigMap name in one line with the used pencil icon,
omit unnecessary "Selected sysprep" string in this section.

Fixes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-41844
@hstastna hstastna force-pushed the BZ_Improve_sysprep_section branch from 229f23c to a4cf536 Compare May 20, 2024 15:54
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented May 20, 2024

@hstastna: This pull request references CNV-41844 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

📝 Description

Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-41844

Improve sysprep section in InstanceTypes tab while using existing sysprep: display ConfigMap name in one line with the used Pencil icon, omit unnecessary Selected sysprep string in this section.

🎥 Screenshots

Before:
Not as nicely readable Sysprep section:
s_before

After:
s_after

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@hstastna
Copy link
Author

@avivtur @pcbailey @upalatucci @metalice please review

moreInfoURL={moreInfoURL}
/>
</FlexItem>
{(bodyContent || breadcrumb || descriptionHeader || label || moreInfoURL) && (
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can u please explain the condition seems a bit strange the || between hard values

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't want to render the header if none of these props are defined.

@hstastna hstastna requested a review from metalice May 21, 2024 08:45
@metalice
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Passed code review, ready for merge label May 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 22, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hstastna, metalice

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit ae4c3ff into kubevirt-ui:main May 22, 2024
10 checks passed
@gouyang
Copy link
Member

gouyang commented Jun 5, 2024

/cherry-pick release-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@gouyang: new pull request created: #2018

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved This issue is something we want to fix jira/valid-reference lgtm Passed code review, ready for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants