support ac flatten display of related resources

[YiscahLevySilas1]

User description

Overview

---

Type

enhancement, bug_fix

---

Description

• Added a new function GetAttackTrackCategoriesByControlIDAndAttackTrackName in gitregostore/gitstoremethods.go to enhance data access granularity.
• Upgraded Go version to 1.21 and updated several dependencies in go.mod for security patches and new features.
• Enhanced control definition in controls/C-0267-workloadwithclustertakeoverroles.json with displayRelatedResources and clickableResourceKind for improved UI interactivity.

---

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files

Enhancement

gitstoremethods.go Add Function to Fetch Attack Track Categories by IDs          gitregostore/gitstoremethods.go Added a new function GetAttackTrackCategoriesByControlIDAndAttackTrackName to retrieve attack track categories by control ID and attack track name. This function enhances the ability to fetch specific attack track information, improving data access granularity. +14/-0    go.mod Upgrade Go Version and Update Dependencies                              go.mod Upgraded Go version to 1.21. Updated dependencies, including github.com/armosec/armoapi-go, github.com/kubescape/opa-utils, and go.uber.org/zap among others. This update includes security patches and new features from the dependencies. +79/-71  C-0267-workloadwithclustertakeoverroles.json Enhance Control Definition with UI Interactivity Features controls/C-0267-workloadwithclustertakeoverroles.json Added displayRelatedResources and clickableResourceKind properties to the control definition. These additions enhance UI interactivity by allowing related resources to be displayed and clicked. +3/-1

---

✨ PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Description updated to latest commit (395f665)

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and well-defined across multiple files, but they involve critical areas such as dependency updates, new functionality in data access, and UI enhancements which require careful consideration.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
🔍 Possible issues	Error Handling: The new function GetAttackTrackCategoriesByControlIDAndAttackTrackName in gitregostore/gitstoremethods.go might not handle all possible error scenarios gracefully, especially if control.GetAllAttackTrackCategories() returns an empty or nil slice.
	Dependency Updates: The significant number of updated dependencies in go.mod could introduce unexpected behavior or compatibility issues that require thorough testing.
	UI Changes: The addition of displayRelatedResources and clickableResourceKind in controls/C-0267-workloadwithclustertakeoverroles.json should be verified for correct UI rendering and interaction.
🔒 Security concerns	No

---

✨ Review tool usage guide:

---

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is: pr_commands = ["/review", ...] meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag) a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)

Extra sub-tools The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

Auto-approve PRs By invoking: /review auto_approve The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions

Category	Suggestions
Enhancement	Handle the case of an empty categories slice to provide clearer error messages. Consider handling the case where control.GetAllAttackTrackCategories() returns an empty slice. This could happen if the control has no categories associated with it. You might want to return a specific error or handle this case differently to avoid iterating over an empty slice and directly returning the "not found" error. gitregostore/gitstoremethods.go [233-234] categories := control.GetAllAttackTrackCategories() +if len(categories) == 0 { + return opapolicy.AttackTrackCategories{}, fmt.Errorf("no attack track categories found in control '%s'", controlID) +} for _, category := range categories {
	Verify project and dependencies compatibility with Go 1.21. The go 1.21 directive specifies the Go version expected by your module. Given the significant changes and improvements in each Go version, ensure that your project and all dependencies are fully compatible with Go 1.21. This might involve testing and updating the codebase to accommodate any breaking changes or deprecated features. go.mod [3] -go 1.21 +go 1.21 // Ensure compatibility with this version
	Add validation for new fields to ensure data integrity. Consider adding a validation mechanism or schema to ensure that the "displayRelatedResources" and "clickableResourceKind" fields are always populated with the expected data types and values. This can help maintain consistency and prevent errors in the configuration. controls/C-0267-workloadwithclustertakeoverroles.json [13-14] -"displayRelatedResources": true, -"clickableResourceKind": "ServiceAccount" +"displayRelatedResources": true, # Ensure this is always a boolean +"clickableResourceKind": "ServiceAccount" # Validate against a list of allowed resource kinds
Performance	Use a map for direct lookup of attack track categories by name to improve performance. To improve the performance and readability of the GetAttackTrackCategoriesByControlIDAndAttackTrackName function, consider using a map to store attack track categories by their names. This would allow you to look up the category directly by its name instead of iterating over all categories. gitregostore/gitstoremethods.go [233-236] -categories := control.GetAllAttackTrackCategories() -for _, category := range categories { - if category.AttackTrack == attackTrackName { - return category, nil - } +categoriesMap := control.GetAttackTrackCategoriesMap() // Assuming this method is implemented to return a map[string]opapolicy.AttackTrackCategories +if category, ok := categoriesMap[attackTrackName]; ok { + return category, nil }
Best practice	Simplify error handling by not repeating error messages. It's a good practice to avoid repeating error messages. Since the error message "error getting control" is already being constructed in the GetOPAControlByID method, you can simplify the error handling in GetAttackTrackCategoriesByControlIDAndAttackTrackName by not wrapping the error with a similar message again. gitregostore/gitstoremethods.go [229-231] control, err := gs.GetOPAControlByID(controlID) if err != nil { - return opapolicy.AttackTrackCategories{}, fmt.Errorf("in GetAttackTrackCategoriesByControlIDAndAttackTrackName: error getting control: %s. error: %w", controlID, err) + return opapolicy.AttackTrackCategories{}, err }
	Use predefined error variables for common error cases. When returning errors, especially for not found cases, it's helpful to use predefined error variables. This allows callers to easily check the type of error without relying on string matching. Consider defining a ErrCategoryNotFound error at the package level. gitregostore/gitstoremethods.go [239] -return opapolicy.AttackTrackCategories{}, fmt.Errorf("attack track category '%s' not found in control '%s'", attackTrackName, controlID) +var ErrCategoryNotFound = errors.New("category not found") +// Then, in the function: +return opapolicy.AttackTrackCategories{}, fmt.Errorf("%w: '%s' in control '%s'", ErrCategoryNotFound, attackTrackName, controlID)
	Use a released version of github.com/davecgh/go-spew to ensure dependency stability. The dependency github.com/davecgh/go-spew v1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33cc is using a pseudo-version. It's recommended to use a released version of dependencies when possible to ensure stability. Check if there is a released version of github.com/davecgh/go-spew that can be used instead. go.mod [51] -github.com/davecgh/go-spew v1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33cc // indirect +github.com/davecgh/go-spew v1.1.2 // Use the latest released version, if compatible.
Maintainability	Make the function more testable by injecting dependencies. To ensure that the function GetAttackTrackCategoriesByControlIDAndAttackTrackName is easily testable, consider injecting dependencies such as GetOPAControlByID. This would make it easier to mock these dependencies in tests. gitregostore/gitstoremethods.go [229] -control, err := gs.GetOPAControlByID(controlID) +// Assume `gs` has a field `controlGetter` of type `func(string) (Control, error)` that is set to `gs.GetOPAControlByID` by default. +// This allows tests to inject a mock function for `controlGetter`. +control, err := gs.controlGetter(controlID)
	Consolidate github.com/cenkalti/backoff to a single version to avoid compatibility issues. Consider consolidating the usage of github.com/cenkalti/backoff to a single version. You have both github.com/cenkalti/backoff v2.2.1+incompatible and github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4 v4.2.1 listed as dependencies. This can lead to confusion and potential compatibility issues in your project. If possible, migrate all usages to the newer version v4.2.1. go.mod [47-48] -github.com/cenkalti/backoff v2.2.1+incompatible // indirect github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4 v4.2.1 // indirect
	Standardize on a single UUID package to simplify the codebase. You have both github.com/google/uuid v1.6.0 and github.com/satori/go.uuid (if present in your project but not shown in the diff). It's common to see projects using both, leading to unnecessary duplication. If both are used in the project, consider standardizing on one UUID package to simplify the codebase and reduce the binary size. go.mod [71] -github.com/google/uuid v1.6.0 // indirect +github.com/google/uuid v1.6.0 // Standardize on `github.com/google/uuid` and remove `github.com/satori/go.uuid` if it's also used.
Possible issue	Update github.com/docker/docker to a Go modules compatible version to ensure dependency resolution reliability. Update github.com/docker/docker to a version compatible with Go modules to avoid potential issues with dependency resolution. The current version v25.0.1+incompatible might not be fully compatible with Go modules. If a compatible version is available, consider using it. go.mod [52] -github.com/docker/docker v25.0.1+incompatible // indirect +github.com/docker/docker v20.10.8 // Use a version that follows semantic versioning and is compatible with Go modules, if available.

---

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

---

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is: pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...] meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: failure
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success