Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

push-build: Support pushing fast builds to a /fast subdirectory #1389

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2020

Conversation

justaugustus
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

(Follow-up to #1387, #1386, and #1385.)

(This inverts the logic of a previous commit --> 1e56e60)

After reviewing the Kubernetes build scenarios and currently configured
jobs, it becomes clear that a "fast" build (linux/amd64-only) is a
special case.

Fast builds only happen on the master branch, which means master version
markers are the only ones experiencing collisions.

That said, cross builds are the default build type across release
branches and we should instead special-case fast builds, giving them
their own subdirectory and version markers to leverage.

The following markers should be built when an accompanying k/test-infra
PR is merged:

  • latest-fast
  • latest-1-fast
  • latest-1.19-fast

With fast builds being published to the following location:
gs://kubernetes-release-dev/ci/fast/

Signed-off-by: Stephen Augustus [email protected]

/assign @tpepper @hasheddan @saschagrunert @cpanato
cc: @kubernetes/release-engineering @BenTheElder @spiffxp
ref: kubernetes/sig-release#850, kubernetes/sig-release#759

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

push-build: Support pushing fast builds to a /fast subdirectory

(This inverts the logic of a previous commit.)

After reviewing the Kubernetes build scenarios and currently configured
jobs, it becomes clear that a "fast" build (linux/amd64-only) is a
special case.

Fast builds only happen on the master branch, which means master version
markers are the only ones experiencing collisions.

That said, cross builds are the default build type across release
branches and we should instead special-case fast builds, giving them
their own subdirectory and version markers to leverage.

The following markers should be built when an accompanying k/test-infra
PR is merged:
- latest-fast
- latest-1-fast
- latest-1.19-fast

With fast builds being published to the following location:
gs://kubernetes-release-dev/ci/fast/

Signed-off-by: Stephen Augustus <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. do-not-merge/blocked-paths Indicates that a PR should not merge because it touches files in blocked paths. labels Jul 3, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@justaugustus: Adding label: do-not-merge/blocked-paths because PR changes a protected file.

Reasons for blocking this PR:

[Changes to certain release tools can affect our ability to test, build, and release Kubernetes. This PR must be explicitly approved by SIG Release repo admins.]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-priority size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 3, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jul 3, 2020
@justaugustus justaugustus removed the do-not-merge/blocked-paths Indicates that a PR should not merge because it touches files in blocked paths. label Jul 3, 2020
Copy link
Member

@cpanato cpanato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 3, 2020
Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato, justaugustus, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants