-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 702
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
REQUEST: Migrate aws/karpenter-core #4562
Comments
Haven't heard any word from @mwielgus after the lazy consensus period expired. From our WG meetings, we had approval from all the SIG Autoscaling chairs to move forward on the repo migration. @gjtempleton Any word on if we should wait for @mwielgus to respond to the original request or just move forward with a lgtm, assuming lazy consensus and taking the verbal agreement in the WG meeting to mean that we can proceed? |
Given the past discussions in the WG and the expiry of the lazy consensus period with no objections, happy to give this the SIG Leadership stamp of approval. |
LGTM :) |
/sig autoscaling |
@mrbobbytables @nikhita I see y'all are the primary reviewers. Looks like we got sign-off from the SIG. What do we need to do here to get traction around the request? |
We've +1s from sig-autoscaling leads. Thanks! I'll go ahead with /assign |
Hey @sergkondr @abeer-stripe @shikai93 @gfcroft @lucass4 @wkaczynski @spring1843 @engedaam @njtran! Y'all are currently on the list of contributors to |
Following the kubernetes-repositories.md#rules-for-donated-repositories:
Following needs to be added post-transfer (ideally occur shortly thereafter) cc: @jonathan-innis
We have to use an intermediary org (https://github.com/kubernetes-purgatory) to transfer the repo. |
Repo has been migrated to PR to to add new repo to k/community sigs.yaml is merged - kubernetes/community#7624 I'll work on adding GitHub teams for the new repo my tommorow morning. |
PR to add GitHub teams: #4602 |
@Priyankasaggu11929 A clarifying point on the first two tasks that are mentioned in that tasklist above. It's not clear to me if we should use "Copyright 2023 The Kubernetes Authors" on all files now or if there should be subset of files that need some other copyright attribution. Can you help clarify here? |
This is to be added to all files where folks who're in NOTICE file (who haven't signed CNCF CLA) has contributed.
@mrbobbytables, can you please confirm if this will be in addition to the kubernetes copyright header?
^ one is to add the standard kubernetes copyright header text to all code files - https://git.k8s.io/kubernetes/hack/boilerplate/boilerplate.go.txt |
@Priyankasaggu11929 @mrbobbytables If there are no current contributions that that person has (by looking at the blame file), are we able to remove them from the NOTICE file and not add copyright attribution for them? Or is it if the user has touched the file at all? |
@Priyankasaggu11929 @mrbobbytables Bump on this again. Need some confirmation around how to proceed here with the license files to make sure we are up-to-date with the requirements and can work towards closing this issue out. |
@jonathan-innis and I chatted out of band. Looking at prior art across the project, I could not find a project that had both a NOTICE file and copyright header with multiple authors. For now I've given them to go ahead to skip that part of migration and will take it back to the github admins to discuss. |
@Priyankasaggu11929 @mrbobbytables The license change should be in now. The only remaining item that's left off of this list is: |
Just knocked out the last item! I think we are good here! Thanks @Priyankasaggu11929 and @mrbobbytables for all of the support! |
New repo, staging repo, or migrate existing
Migrate existing
Is it a staging repo?
no
Requested name for new repository
karpenter
Which Organization should it reside
kubernetes-sigs
Who should have admin access?
mwielgus, maciekpytel, gjtempleton,
etarn, ellistarn, jonathan-innis, tzneal, bwagner5, njtranWho should have write access?
N/A
Who should be listed as approvers in OWNERS?
mwielgus, maciekpytel, gjtempleton,
etarn, ellistarn, jonathan-innis, tzneal, bwagner5, njtranWho should be listed in SECURITY_CONTACTS?
jonathan-innis, etarn, njtran, tzneal
What should the repo description be?
Karpenter is a Kubernetes Node Lifecycle Management Solution built for flexibility, performance, and simplicity.
What SIG and subproject does this fall under?
sig-autoscaling
Please provide references to appropriate approval for this new repo
Approval from SIG chair (@gjtempleton) after lazy consensus period here: #4258 (comment)
Awaiting approval from @mwielgus and then we have a go-ahead on this move.
Additional context for request
We're staging out a final release prior to the repo move (
v0.32.0
) which should be completed today or tomorrow. After that point, we have the forward momentum to begin removing the repo to have the next release (v0.33.0
) be released from thekubernetes-sigs
organization.We'd like to see the
OWNERS
,OWNERS_ALIASES
, andSECURITY_CONTACTS.md
files look like thisOWNERS
fileOWNERS_ALIASES
fileSECURITY_CONTACTS
fileThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: