Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move ReadonlyFilesystem Node Condition to a new configuration file #955

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

DigitalVeer
Copy link
Contributor

We're enhancing NPD to support detection of various read-only scenarios (e.g., boot disk, local SSDs, network-attached drives). To support this, the ReadonlyFilesystem configuration is being moved from the kernel monitor into a dedicated plugin configuration file that will take over this new functionality.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 20, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @DigitalVeer!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/node-problem-detector 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/node-problem-detector has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @DigitalVeer. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 20, 2024
@AnishShah
Copy link

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 20, 2024
@mmiranda96
Copy link
Contributor

/retest
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 20, 2024
@mmiranda96
Copy link
Contributor

You need to add your new plugin config file to

--config.system-log-monitor=/home/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/config/kernel-monitor.json,/home/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/config/docker-monitor.json,/home/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/config/systemd-monitor.json \
(and potentially other files).

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 20, 2024
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Sep 20, 2024

/cc @wangzhen127
/assign @wangzhen127

@wangzhen127
Copy link
Member

To make sure it is backward compatible for people using the OSS config file directly, we need to add the new file to all the locations where kernel-monitor.json is invoked: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Akubernetes%2Fnode-problem-detector%20kernel-monitor.json&type=code

Copy link
Contributor

@mmiranda96 mmiranda96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thanks for your contribution!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 23, 2024
"logPath": "/dev/kmsg",
"lookback": "5m",
"bufferSize": 10,
"source": "kernel-monitor",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

readonly-monitor

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 9, 2024
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Oct 9, 2024

@DigitalVeer please rebase and squash the commits.

Moved the ReadonlyFilesystem Node Condition to a separate plugin
configuration file and updated NPD to contain the appropiate new flags.
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Oct 9, 2024

/retest
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 9, 2024
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Oct 9, 2024

/retest

@wangzhen127
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DigitalVeer, hakman, mmiranda96, wangzhen127

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 9, 2024
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Oct 9, 2024

@wangzhen127 There's a problem with the failing tests. Seems to be something broken in some other related repo. Any ideas?

@wangzhen127
Copy link
Member

/retest

1 similar comment
@wangzhen127
Copy link
Member

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants