Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support non-default docker endpoints #9510
Support non-default docker endpoints #9510
Changes from 8 commits
d384343
85d45be
34a2dc7
eaa9ecf
89bf9ac
6e02753
6b3bf1f
acbdafa
e0b4957
43a4b62
72b710a
c97cd91
d5a092c
996b05b
69c2b01
e58d538
aa6a693
0f2c638
76c62af
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the rules for podman should be the same as for docker, when it comes to external vs. local
only the default transport differs, if it is tcp: or ssh: (as opposed to unix: for the local socket)
eventually it is going to end up looking very similar, once we get rid of the legacy protocols
then it will always be the same unix socket, possibly tunneled over a ssh connection first...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed. I just want to reduce the scope of this PR and implement support of external docker endpoints here, and later do the same for Podman.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am okay with adding that in a following up PR, once we add support for non default podman