-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix misusage of RLock in timeCache lru.Cache.Get() #94751
Conversation
Hi @auxten. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
/lgtm |
/assign @liggitt Jordan, since this was added by you. please review |
good catch, thanks! can you also open a cherry-pick to release-1.19? /lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: auxten, liggitt The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Lru's Get() method also updates the least recent usage information. So, we should not use RLock() and even RWLock here.
An alternative fix is just using
github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru
, but that will introduce more diffs. If that is the better fix, I can also do that.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes a potential race condition
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: