Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update taint nodes by condition to GA #82703

Conversation

draveness
Copy link
Contributor

@draveness draveness commented Sep 13, 2019

/kind feature
/sig scheduling
/priority important-soon
/assign @k82cn

What this PR does / why we need it:

Graduate TaintNodesByCondition to GA

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #82635

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Graduate TaintNodesByCondition to GA in 1.17. (feature gate will be removed in 1.18) action required

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 13, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. area/apiserver area/kubelet area/test sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 15, 2019
@draveness draveness force-pushed the feature/graduate-taint-nodes-by-condition-to-ga branch 2 times, most recently from 32e67c2 to e82e01f Compare September 16, 2019 15:31
@draveness
Copy link
Contributor Author

The node e2e integration tests are failing since we are removing the TaintNodeByCondition feature gates from the codebase.

https://prow.k8s.io/view/gcs/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/82703/pull-kubernetes-node-e2e/1173534864813592576/

I scanned through the PR history and found out TaintNodeByCondition was disabled on purpose in node e2e test. #73097 (comment)

cc/ @bsalamat @liggitt @yujuhong, do you have any idea on how to fix this?

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Sep 16, 2019

If the node e2e doesn't want to run the node controller (which handles resolving this taint if I remember correctly), the node e2e will need to mimic that behavior in its setup.

In general, running partial environments in e2e tests is not recommended, because of the duplication/drift inherent in running a system different than a "real" cluster.

@roycaihw
Copy link
Member

/remove-sig api-machinery
/sig cloud-provider

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. labels Sep 16, 2019
@draveness
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @deads2k @wojtek-t

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Oct 17, 2019

/approve

controller, admission, and kubeapiserver changes all look fine.

@ahg-g
Copy link
Member

ahg-g commented Oct 17, 2019

/approve

@draveness
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @tallclair
for kubelet approval

@wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

/approve

/hold
Please rebase and hold cancel.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 18, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahg-g, deads2k, draveness, wojtek-t

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 18, 2019
@draveness draveness force-pushed the feature/graduate-taint-nodes-by-condition-to-ga branch from 89b423b to f729058 Compare October 18, 2019 09:45
@ahg-g
Copy link
Member

ahg-g commented Oct 18, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 18, 2019
@draveness
Copy link
Contributor Author

draveness commented Oct 18, 2019 via email

@draveness draveness force-pushed the feature/graduate-taint-nodes-by-condition-to-ga branch from f729058 to 823183a Compare October 18, 2019 17:41
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 18, 2019
@draveness draveness force-pushed the feature/graduate-taint-nodes-by-condition-to-ga branch from 823183a to 1163a1d Compare October 19, 2019 01:17
@draveness
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ahg-g
Copy link
Member

ahg-g commented Oct 19, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 19, 2019
@ahg-g
Copy link
Member

ahg-g commented Oct 19, 2019

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 19, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit aab740f into kubernetes:master Oct 19, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.17 milestone Oct 19, 2019
@draveness draveness deleted the feature/graduate-taint-nodes-by-condition-to-ga branch October 19, 2019 03:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/apiserver area/kubelet area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-action-required Denotes a PR that introduces potentially breaking changes that require user action. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Graduate TaintNodesByCondition to GA
10 participants