Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #55119 #55156

Conversation

pires
Copy link
Contributor

@pires pires commented Nov 6, 2017

Cherry pick of #55119 on release-1.7.

#55119: fix scheduler predicates test that may violate DNS label

This commit fixes an issue where in clusters which have FQDN as the node names,
one of the scheduling predicates tests will fail because it will try and run a
pod with a name that violates DNS-1123 rules. As an example, one such pod name
could look like "filler-pod-kube-node-0.kubelet.mesos".

Signed-off-by: Paulo Pires <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pires: All 'parent' PRs of a cherry-pick PR must have one of the "release-note" or "release-note-action-required" labels, or this PR must follow the standard/parent release note labeling requirement.

The following parent PRs have neither the "release-note" nor the "release-note-action-required" labels: #55119.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pires: Adding do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed because the release note process has not been followed.

One of the following labels is required "release-note", "release-note-action-required", or "release-note-none".
Please see: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/pull-requests.md#write-release-notes-if-needed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Nov 6, 2017
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 6, 2017
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. label Nov 6, 2017
@pires
Copy link
Contributor Author

pires commented Nov 6, 2017

/release-note-none

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Nov 6, 2017
@pires
Copy link
Contributor Author

pires commented Nov 6, 2017

cc @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. label Nov 6, 2017
@mwielgus mwielgus added this to the v1.7 milestone Nov 6, 2017
@pires
Copy link
Contributor Author

pires commented Nov 6, 2017

@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

bsalamat commented Nov 6, 2017

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 6, 2017
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bsalamat, pires

Associated issue: 55119

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 6, 2017
@pires
Copy link
Contributor Author

pires commented Nov 6, 2017

thank you @bsalamat. can you remove the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label, please?

@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

bsalamat commented Nov 6, 2017

/hold cancel

@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

bsalamat commented Nov 6, 2017

hmm... looks like this was not the command to remove do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved.

@mwielgus mwielgus added cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. labels Nov 7, 2017
@pires
Copy link
Contributor Author

pires commented Nov 7, 2017

/retest

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 485f620 into kubernetes:release-1.7 Nov 7, 2017
@k8s-cherrypick-bot
Copy link

Commit found in the "release-1.7" branch appears to be this PR. Removing the "cherrypick-candidate" label. If this is an error find help to get your PR picked.

@pires pires deleted the automated-cherry-pick-of-#55119-upstream-release-1.7 branch November 7, 2017 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants