Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix backwards compatibility when backend mode isn't set #9755

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2020

Conversation

WarpRat
Copy link
Contributor

@WarpRat WarpRat commented Aug 14, 2020

This will address the issue opened here: #9750

I changed the test to confirm that the gotemplate or function worked as expected. I ran the test multiple times locally with a different mix of configurations to confirm that this somewhat ugly chain of if/or/not works as intended and will address the issue.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 14, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @WarpRat. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 14, 2020
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 14, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 14, 2020
@fred-vogt
Copy link

@WarpRat - Excellent work my friend. Thanks for jumping on this so quickly.

I'm still building an integration around the newly available backendMode(s).

@WarpRat
Copy link
Contributor Author

WarpRat commented Aug 14, 2020

@fred-vogt - no problem, feel foolish that I missed this in the first place. I still need to make a minor update to bring the docs in line with the new default cluster id which @rifelpet suggested and the minor simplification that @johngmyers suggested above, but I should be able to handle that in an hour or two once I'm off work.

@@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ spec:
{{- if or (not .Authentication.Aws.BackendMode) (contains "MountedFile" .Authentication.Aws.BackendMode) }}
- --config=/etc/aws-iam-authenticator/config.yaml
{{- end }}
{{- if or .Authentication.Aws.ClusterID (not (contains "MountedFile" .Authentication.Aws.BackendMode))}}
- --cluster-id={{ or .Authentication.Aws.ClusterID .MasterPublicName }}
{{- if or .Authentication.Aws.ClusterID (not .Authentication.Aws.BackendMode) (not (contains "MountedFile" .Authentication.Aws.BackendMode))}}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure i understand the logic change here.

The old logic would add --cluster-id if any of the following:

  • ClusterID API field is set
  • BackendMode does not contain MountedFile (including if BackendMode is not set)

This new logic will add --cluster-id if any of the following:

  • ClusterID API field is set
  • BackendMode API field is not set
  • BackendMode API field does not contain MountedFile

Wouldn't we want to not set --cluster-id if BackendMode is not set in order to preserve original behavior?

Suggested change
{{- if or .Authentication.Aws.ClusterID (not .Authentication.Aws.BackendMode) (not (contains "MountedFile" .Authentication.Aws.BackendMode))}}
{{- if or .Authentication.Aws.ClusterID (and .Authentication.Aws.BackendMode (not (contains "MountedFile" .Authentication.Aws.BackendMode)))}}

The above would add --cluster-id if any of the following:

  • ClusterID API field is set
  • BackendMode API field is set and does not contain MountedFile

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, you're right. In my local tests I saw the --cluser-id flag get replaced with the --config and didn't even notice the clusterID flag was just a few lines lower. I've tested all the different possibilities you mentioned here and with your suggested change everything is working as expected. Thanks for catching that.

@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

👍
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 17, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rifelpet, WarpRat

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 17, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 655c424 into kubernetes:master Aug 17, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.19 milestone Aug 17, 2020
@WarpRat WarpRat deleted the 9750 branch August 17, 2020 17:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/addons area/documentation cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants