Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kube-apiserver-healthcheck: actually enable on 1.17 #9095

Merged

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Member

@justinsb justinsb commented May 8, 2020

We cherry picked, but now we need to activate the feature.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.17 milestone May 8, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 8, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 8, 2020
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

justinsb commented May 8, 2020

I expect this to fail until we merge #9096

We cherry picked, but now we need to activate the feature.
@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the enable_healthcheck_1_17 branch from f612af2 to 11b0b30 Compare May 8, 2020 15:28
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ func (b *KubeAPIServerOptionsBuilder) BuildOptions(o interface{}) error {
c.AnonymousAuth = fi.Bool(false)
}

if b.IsKubernetesGTE("1.18") {
if b.IsKubernetesGTE("1.17") {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You'll want to change this on master branch as well. How about first landing to master and then cherrypicking?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair point, that's an easy follow up.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops - will send PR to master now :-)

Copy link
Contributor

@mikesplain mikesplain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @justinsb, I definitely support getting this in.

/lgtm
/approve

@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ func (b *KubeAPIServerOptionsBuilder) BuildOptions(o interface{}) error {
c.AnonymousAuth = fi.Bool(false)
}

if b.IsKubernetesGTE("1.18") {
if b.IsKubernetesGTE("1.17") {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair point, that's an easy follow up.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 8, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: justinsb, mikesplain

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [justinsb,mikesplain]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants