Add Cilium.EnablePolicy back into templates

[olemarkus]

This may have dropped out when we bumped Cilium to 1.6
It is possible to set this value in the cluster spec, but it isn't used anywhere

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @olemarkus. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[joshbranham]

/ok-to-test

[olemarkus]

/test pull-kops-e2e-kubernetes-aws

[olemarkus]

/test pull-kops-e2e-kubernetes-aws

[johngmyers]

/retest

[johngmyers]

/retest

[johngmyers]

/retest

[johngmyers]

/retest

[olemarkus]

As far as I can tell, the build skips uploading any artifacts like protokube etc. Which perhaps makes sense since I don't change any of them.
But then the download job in the kops-configuration service complains about hash mismatch when downloading these artifacts.

[olemarkus]

A rebase fixed it, it seems 🤷‍♂️

[olemarkus]

/kind bug

[johngmyers]

/lgtm

[rifelpet]

/approve
/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: olemarkus, rifelpet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [rifelpet]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment