Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO-7148] Digital Ocean support for etcd-manager #7435

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 25, 2019

Conversation

srikiz
Copy link
Contributor

@srikiz srikiz commented Aug 19, 2019

This PR incorporates changes to use etcd-manager, instead of the legacy mode.
Able to see the cluster coming up Ok with this change.

Please refer to the etcdmanager PR that is merged (kopeio/etcd-manager#243) to incorporate DigitialOcean related changes.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Aug 19, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @srikiz. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 19, 2019
Copy link
Member

@zetaab zetaab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 19, 2019
@zetaab
Copy link
Member

zetaab commented Aug 19, 2019

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 19, 2019
@zetaab
Copy link
Member

zetaab commented Aug 19, 2019

/assign @gambol99

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2019
@zetaab
Copy link
Member

zetaab commented Aug 20, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2019
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ func (b *EtcdManagerBuilder) buildPod(etcdCluster *kops.EtcdClusterSpec) (*v1.Po
config.VolumeProvider = "do"

config.VolumeTag = []string{
fmt.Sprintf("kubernetes.io/cluster/%s=owned", b.Cluster.Name),
fmt.Sprintf("kubernetes.io/cluster=%s", b.Cluster.Name),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmmm... can we follow the pattern that we use elsewhere (the kubernetes.io/cluster/<clustername> key). I'm assuming that keys are unique in DO also, and the reason is that the kubernetes.io/cluster=<clustername> pattern does not allow for shared objects. Admittedly sharing a volume would be weird, but sharing e.g. VPCs on AWS is pretty common.

This probably isn't as important on DO today, but it's unimportant until we find the first object we want to share :-)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure @justinsb - this change would in-turn need a change to etcd-manager repo as well. May be we can get this merged if you are Ok, and then I'll take this separately to update both KOPS and etcd-manager repo. Please suggest if this sounds Ok for you.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure ... that works :-)

@justinsb
Copy link
Member

Thanks @srikiz

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: justinsb, srikiz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 25, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 195297e into kubernetes:master Aug 25, 2019
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants