Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Calico manifests to better match the latest release #7384

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tmjd
Copy link
Contributor

@tmjd tmjd commented Aug 6, 2019

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 6, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tmjd. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 6, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tmjd
To complete the pull request process, please assign mikesplain
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @mikesplain in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tmjd tmjd force-pushed the sync-calico-manifests branch from 1b63c6c to 303726a Compare August 7, 2019 16:12
- Adds mounts for Application layer policy https://docs.projectcalico.org/v3.8/security/app-layer-policy/
- Re-organizes manifest to better match (reduce differences) with source
  Calico manifests.
  https://docs.projectcalico.org/v3.8/manifests/calico-etcd.yaml
  https://docs.projectcalico.org/v3.8/manifests/calico.yaml
- Switch install-cni container to initContainer
- Fix critical annotation on kube-controller
@tmjd tmjd force-pushed the sync-calico-manifests branch from 303726a to 3c58b90 Compare August 7, 2019 20:01
@tmjd
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmjd commented Aug 7, 2019

/assign @mikesplain

@tmjd
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmjd commented Aug 7, 2019

I've tested this out by:

@tmjd
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmjd commented Aug 22, 2019

I don't want this PR to get too out of date. What is the next step needed here?

@miguelbernadi
Copy link

This Pr is also very interesting for my case as it adds the PriorityClassName to calico. We recently added PriorityClasses to the cluster for our apps and calico-node got evicted due to receiving the default (lowest) priority. Would be very glad to see it become part of a patch release for 1.13.

@mikesplain
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @tmjd sorry for the delay on this, let me dive in a bit and get back to you. I recently did a similar update so I need to make sure these line up right. Also, I really think we should only be updating the v1.12 manifest because we don't run any tests against those old versions and really do not support them any more given our deprecation policy. That said, I really really appreciate your work on this and the contribution! I'll setup a reminder to look at this later this week when I can give it the time it deserves.

@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Jan 5, 2020

@tmjd @mikesplain I think #8104 does something similar for latest Calico manifest.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tmjd: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 5, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 4, 2020
@mikesplain
Copy link
Contributor

Since this has been since handled, closing. Sorry for the delay and thanks for the contribution.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mikesplain: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Since this has been since handled, closing. Sorry for the delay and thanks for the contribution.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants