-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Calico manifests to better match the latest release #7384
Conversation
Hi @tmjd. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tmjd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
1b63c6c
to
303726a
Compare
- Adds mounts for Application layer policy https://docs.projectcalico.org/v3.8/security/app-layer-policy/ - Re-organizes manifest to better match (reduce differences) with source Calico manifests. https://docs.projectcalico.org/v3.8/manifests/calico-etcd.yaml https://docs.projectcalico.org/v3.8/manifests/calico.yaml - Switch install-cni container to initContainer - Fix critical annotation on kube-controller
303726a
to
3c58b90
Compare
/assign @mikesplain |
I've tested this out by:
|
I don't want this PR to get too out of date. What is the next step needed here? |
This Pr is also very interesting for my case as it adds the PriorityClassName to calico. We recently added PriorityClasses to the cluster for our apps and calico-node got evicted due to receiving the default (lowest) priority. Would be very glad to see it become part of a patch release for 1.13. |
Hey @tmjd sorry for the delay on this, let me dive in a bit and get back to you. I recently did a similar update so I need to make sure these line up right. Also, I really think we should only be updating the v1.12 manifest because we don't run any tests against those old versions and really do not support them any more given our deprecation policy. That said, I really really appreciate your work on this and the contribution! I'll setup a reminder to look at this later this week when I can give it the time it deserves. |
@tmjd @mikesplain I think #8104 does something similar for latest Calico manifest. |
@tmjd: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Since this has been since handled, closing. Sorry for the delay and thanks for the contribution. /close |
@mikesplain: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Calico manifests.
https://docs.projectcalico.org/v3.8/manifests/calico-etcd.yaml
https://docs.projectcalico.org/v3.8/manifests/calico.yaml