-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding documentation to mitigate workload outages on AWS #7292
Adding documentation to mitigate workload outages on AWS #7292
Conversation
Welcome @endzyme! |
Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA. It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Hi @endzyme. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
When running the upgrade process to quickly roll all the master, you can enter a state which causes nodes to become `NotReady`. This can lead to nodes (potentially _all_ nodes) being removed from ELBs managed by Kubernetes Services type LoadBalancer. In order to avoid this you can add an IAM policy which temporarily blocks Kubernetes from removing nodes from ELBs, thus mitigating the temporary reconciliation state. Co-Authored-By: Ivan Fetch <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Corey O'Brien <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: FairwindsOps <[email protected]>
/ok-to-test |
/lgtm |
Thanks for the contribution @endzyme ! /retest |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: chrisz100, endzyme, KashifSaadat The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Cherry pick of #7292 onto release-1.14
@endzyme did this actually happen to you? This corner case sounds more reasonable if a network partition was encountered. while etcd is down, kube-apiserver is down, kcm can not get notready status. once kube-apiserver is back up, kubelets will be checking in to update ready status |
Yes it was quite common on our upgrade pattern at my last company. I can't recall specifics after this amount of time but I might be able to put you in touch with others still at the company. |
When running the upgrade process to quickly roll all the master, you can enter a state which causes nodes to become
NotReady
. This can lead to nodes (potentially all nodes) being removed from ELBs managed by Kubernetes Services type LoadBalancer. In order to avoid this you can add an IAM policy which temporarily blocks Kubernetes from removing nodes from ELBs, thus mitigating the temporary reconciliation state.