Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vetting / Formatting / Cleanup #3078

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2017

Conversation

gambol99
Copy link
Contributor

  • fixed any of the vettting / formatting issues that i'm came across on the update
  • removed the commented out lines from the componentconfig as it make its increasingly difficult to find what is supported, what is not and the difference between them.
  • added SerializeImagePulls, RegisterSchedulable to kubelet (by default they are ignored)
  • added FeatureGates to the kube-proxy
  • fixed the vetting issue with NodeUpConfig -> Config
  • added the aws london regions for cloud provider lookup

Out of interest can someone point me to where these multi-versioned componentconfig are being used?

- fixed any of the vettting / formatting issues that i'm came across on the update
- removed the commented out lines from the componentconfig as it make its increasingly difficult to find what is supported, what is not and the difference between them.
- added SerializeImagePulls, RegisterSchedulable to kubelet (by default they are ignored)
- added FeatureGates to the kube-proxy

Out of interest can someone point me to where these multi-versioned componentconfig are being used?
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 28, 2017
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @gambol99. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jul 28, 2017
// hostnameOverride is the hostname used to identify the kubelet instead
// of the actual hostname.
// Note: We recognize some additional values:
// @aws uses the hostname from the AWS metadata service
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This note about @aws is important to keep!


// hostnameOverride, if non-empty, will be used as the identity instead of the actual hostname.
// Note: We recognize some additional values:
// @aws uses the hostname from the AWS metadata service
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably we want to keep the @aws note here also

@justinsb
Copy link
Member

justinsb commented Aug 1, 2017

/ok-to-test

@justinsb
Copy link
Member

justinsb commented Aug 1, 2017

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 1, 2017
@justinsb
Copy link
Member

justinsb commented Aug 1, 2017

It's a whopper of a PR, but thank you for cleaning it all up. Normally I'd ask for it to be split up into its component ideas, but as you took on the thankless task of cleaning up govet I've marked it as LGTM (subject to passing tests!)

@justinsb
Copy link
Member

justinsb commented Aug 1, 2017

/approve no-issue

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gambol99, justinsb

Associated issue requirement bypassed by: justinsb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 1, 2017
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@justinsb
Copy link
Member

justinsb commented Aug 3, 2017

/retest

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 26e0c78 into kubernetes:master Aug 3, 2017
k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2017
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Kube Proxy Feature Gates

- fixing the [kubeproxy feature gates](#3078), this should have been a [map](https://github.com/kubernetes/kops/blob/master/pkg/apis/kops/v1alpha2/componentconfig.go#L134) not  an array ... apologizes!! from
@gambol99 gambol99 deleted the component_options branch February 22, 2019 09:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants