Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump aws lb controller to 2.2.0 #11502

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 16, 2021

Conversation

olemarkus
Copy link
Member

With these changes, we also pass the upstream e2e tests (with some amendments related to them expecting something more similar to EKS).

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 16, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from hakman and johngmyers May 16, 2021 09:45
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/addons area/provider/aws Issues or PRs related to aws provider labels May 16, 2021
@olemarkus olemarkus force-pushed the aws-lb-controller-bump branch from 43a1c14 to 266918d Compare May 16, 2021 10:58
"elasticloadbalancing:ModifyTargetGroupAttributes",
"elasticloadbalancing:ModifyRule",
"elasticloadbalancing:DeleteRule",
"elasticloadbalancing:RemoveTags",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RemoveTags is being added in both statements. Can we consolidate it to just one statement?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm. Is the last statement redundant? Technically they should be for different types of resources (ELBs vs listeners)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Think this should work just as well.

tests/e2e/scenarios/aws-lb-controller/run-test.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@olemarkus olemarkus force-pushed the aws-lb-controller-bump branch 2 times, most recently from fa2c2ce to 8c377cf Compare May 16, 2021 16:17
@olemarkus olemarkus requested a review from rifelpet May 16, 2021 16:18
@olemarkus olemarkus force-pushed the aws-lb-controller-bump branch from 8c377cf to 7df35fa Compare May 16, 2021 16:26
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 16, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rifelpet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 16, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 07f3bc0 into kubernetes:master May 16, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.22 milestone May 16, 2021
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2021
…502-origin-release-1.21

Automated cherry pick of #11502: bump aws lb controller to 2.2.0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/addons area/provider/aws Issues or PRs related to aws provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants