Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude CP nodes from load balancers #10945

Merged

Conversation

olemarkus
Copy link
Member

The new service node exclusion feature went GA in 1.21. We should mark CP nodes so they don't become targets for LB services.
See kubernetes/kubernetes#97543

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 27, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/provider/openstack Issues or PRs related to openstack provider label Feb 27, 2021
@@ -84,5 +84,6 @@ func BuildMandatoryControlPlaneLabels() map[string]string {
nodeLabels[RoleLabelControlPlane20] = ""
nodeLabels[RoleLabelName15] = RoleMasterLabelValue15
nodeLabels["kops.k8s.io/kops-controller-pki"] = ""
nodeLabels["node.kubernetes.io/exclude-from-external-load-balancers"] = ""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we conditionally add this based on kubernetes minor version?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If people have enabled the new service logic, they need this label as well. If they haven't, this is no-op. So my preference is to do this unconditionally.

Copy link

@kuzaxak kuzaxak May 26, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have the logic when Masters hosts ingresses, can we somehow disable this behaviour?

Or even do we need to worry about this change?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 3, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rifelpet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 3, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit fcefcb5 into kubernetes:master Mar 3, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.21 milestone Mar 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/openstack Issues or PRs related to openstack provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants