Bump github.com/opencontainers/runc from 1.1.5 to 1.1.6

[dependabot]

Bumps github.com/opencontainers/runc from 1.1.5 to 1.1.6.

Changelog

Sourced from github.com/opencontainers/runc's changelog.

[1.1.6] - 2023-04-11

In this world nothing is certain but death and taxes.

Compatibility

• This release can no longer be built from sources using Go 1.16. Using a latest maintained Go 1.20.x or Go 1.19.x release is recommended. Go 1.17 can still be used.

Fixed

• systemd cgroup v1 and v2 drivers were deliberately ignoring UnitExist error from systemd while trying to create a systemd unit, which in some scenarios may result in a container not being added to the proper systemd unit and cgroup. (#3780, #3806)
• systemd cgroup v2 driver was incorrectly translating cpuset range from spec's resources.cpu.cpus to systemd unit property (AllowedCPUs) in case of more than 8 CPUs, resulting in the wrong AllowedCPUs setting. (#3808)
• systemd cgroup v1 driver was prefixing container's cgroup path with the path of PID 1 cgroup, resulting in inability to place PID 1 in a non-root cgroup. (#3811)
• runc run/start may return "permission denied" error when starting a rootless container when the file to be executed does not have executable bit set for the user, not taking the CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE capability into account. This is a regression in runc 1.1.4, as well as in Go 1.20 and 1.20.1 (#3715, #3817)
• cgroup v1 drivers are now aware of misc controller. (#3823)
• Various CI fixes and improvements, mostly to ensure Go 1.19.x and Go 1.20.x compatibility.

Commits

• 0f48801 VERSION: release 1.1.6
• 0690c4e merge #3823 into release-1.1
• e4ce94e libct/cg: add misc controller to v1 drivers
• 53333a5 Merge pull request #3811 from haircommander/root-cgroup-no-init-1.1
• 10cfd81 libctr/cgroups: don't take init's cgroup into account
• 9c1c844 Merge pull request #3817 from kolyshkin/1.1-user-exec
• d30d240 tests/int: test for CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
• 840b953 Fix runc run "permission denied" when rootless
• c7a72ab Merge pull request #3808 from kolyshkin/1.1-cpuset-byte-order
• 165d232 tests/int: add a "update cpuset cpus range via v2 unified map" test
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[k8s-ci-robot]

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If Ingress contributors determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @dependabot[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[cpanato]

@dependabot rebase

[cpanato]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato, dependabot[bot]

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [cpanato]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment