Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bumped ginkgo to v2.9.0 #9722

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2023
Merged

bumped ginkgo to v2.9.0 #9722

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2023

Conversation

longwuyuan
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • CVE Report (Scanner found CVE and adding report)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation only

Which issue/s this PR fixes

  • No issue was created as this is a continuation of a internal process related PR by dependabot

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Test by running FOCUS="no-auth-locations" make kind-e2e-test locally

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTION guide
  • I have added unit and/or e2e tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • Added Release Notes.

Does my pull request need a release note?

Any user-visible or operator-visible change qualifies for a release note. This could be a:

  • CLI change
  • API change
  • UI change
  • configuration schema change
  • behavioral change
  • change in non-functional attributes such as efficiency or availability, availability of a new platform
  • a warning about a deprecation
  • fix of a previous Known Issue
  • fix of a vulnerability (CVE)

No release notes are required for changes to the following:

  • Tests
  • Build infrastructure
  • Fixes for unreleased bugs

For more tips on writing good release notes, check out the Release Notes Handbook

Bumped pinned ginkgo version to v2.9.0 as continuation of PR #9695

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority labels Mar 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 12, 2023
@longwuyuan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ @tao12345666333 @strongjz @rikatz seeking review and approval sooner because the related dependaot PR is already merged
/triage accepted
/area stabilization

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. area/stabilization Work for increasing stabilization of the ingress-nginx codebase and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 12, 2023
Copy link
Member

@tao12345666333 tao12345666333 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thanks

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 13, 2023
@tao12345666333
Copy link
Member

/retest

@longwuyuan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/re-test

@longwuyuan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 13, 2023
@strongjz
Copy link
Member

/retest

1 similar comment
@longwuyuan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@longwuyuan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@longwuyuan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@longwuyuan: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Member

@tao12345666333 tao12345666333 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 14, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: longwuyuan, tao12345666333

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 520384b into kubernetes:main Mar 14, 2023
@longwuyuan longwuyuan deleted the ginkgo290 branch March 14, 2023 12:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/stabilization Work for increasing stabilization of the ingress-nginx codebase cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants