Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

applied allowPrivilegeEscalation=false #7948

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2021

Conversation

swgriffith
Copy link
Contributor

This PR addresses issue #7947 by adding the allowPrivilegeEscalation=false flag in the CreateSecret and PathWebHook job specs.

What this PR does / why we need it:

See issue #7947 for the full details, but in short Azure Policy blocks installation of nginx-ingress in some cases. We may be able to get this resolved in Azure Policy, but this may also be a reasonable change in nginx-ingress directly.

Types of changes

  • [X ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation only

Which issue/s this PR fixes

Fixes Issue #7947

How Has This Been Tested?

I've run through all of the steps to recreate from the issue and confirmed that it address the issue and ingress runs successfully.

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • [X ] I've read the CONTRIBUTION guide
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

CLA Not Signed

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please sign in with your organization's credentials at https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf to be authorized.
  • If you have done the above and are still having issues with the CLA being reported as unsigned, please log a ticket with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk: https://support.linuxfoundation.org/
  • Should you encounter any issues with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk, send a message to the backup e-mail support address at: [email protected]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 19, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@swgriffith: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If Ingress contributors determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @swgriffith!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @swgriffith. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 19, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/helm Issues or PRs related to helm charts label Nov 19, 2021
@swgriffith swgriffith force-pushed the job-securitycontext-update branch from 7399be4 to b9eafca Compare November 19, 2021 20:06
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Nov 19, 2021

CLA Signed

The committers are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 19, 2021
@strongjz
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

Thanks for putting this in.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: strongjz, swgriffith

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 20, 2021
@strongjz
Copy link
Member

/milestone v1.1.0

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.1.0 milestone Nov 20, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit e57d2f6 into kubernetes:main Nov 20, 2021
rchshld pushed a commit to joomcode/ingress-nginx that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/helm Issues or PRs related to helm charts cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants