Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear up some inconsistent / unclear wording #4107

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2019

Conversation

MMeent
Copy link
Contributor

@MMeent MMeent commented May 21, 2019

IPv6 enabled/disabled working was confusing or contradicting itself. This updates the wording to what is expected, based on the default values in the table above, and the behaviour that I could find in code.

What this PR does / why we need it:

The current documentation is confusing with regards to IPv6 toggles. This fixes that issue.

IPv6 enabled/disabled working was confusing or contradicting itself. This updates the wording to what is expected, based on the default values in the table above, and the behaviour that I could find in code.
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @MMeent!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label May 21, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MMeent. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 21, 2019
@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented May 21, 2019

IPv6 enabled/disabled working was confusing or contradicting itself.

Yes, apologies for that. Thank you for the PR

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented May 21, 2019

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 21, 2019
@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented May 21, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 21, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aledbf, MMeent

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 21, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@9ee0b5a). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #4107   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage          ?   57.7%           
========================================
  Files             ?      87           
  Lines             ?    6452           
  Branches          ?       0           
========================================
  Hits              ?    3723           
  Misses            ?    2298           
  Partials          ?     431

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9ee0b5a...73c70e2. Read the comment docs.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit def96a5 into kubernetes:master May 21, 2019
@MMeent MMeent deleted the patch-1 branch May 21, 2019 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants