Allow for use subnetworks with IPV6_Only stack type and check if cust… #2624
Conversation
…om subnets of IPv4 services have correct address range Change-Id: I794be04483a472a5728023427b0002c1e91470b3
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
cncf-cla: yes
|
/hold |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cezarygerard The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
approved
|
/assign @panslava |
|
/assign @marqc |
|
@cezarygerard: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: marqc. Note that only kubernetes members with read permissions, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/assign @mmamczur |
|
|
||
| func (l4 *L4) serviceSubnetHasInternalIPv4Range() error { | ||
| subnetName := l4.subnetName() | ||
| hasIPv6SubnetRange, err := utils.SubnetHasIPv4Range(l4.cloud, subnetName, subnetInternalAccessType) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You have IPv6 on the left and IPv4 on the right
| if err != nil { | ||
| return false, fmt.Errorf("failed getting subnet: %w", err) | ||
| } | ||
| return subnet.StackType == DualStackSubnetStackType && subnet.Ipv6AccessType == ipv6AccessType, nil | ||
| stackTypeMatches := subnet.StackType == DualStackSubnetStackType || subnet.StackType == IPv4SubnetStackType | ||
| accessTypeMatches := subnet.Ipv6AccessType == accessType |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
out of curiosity: is ipv6AccessType relevant for IPv4 subnet?
|
|
||
| func (l4netlb *L4NetLB) serviceSubnetHasExternalIPv4Range() error { | ||
| subnetName := l4netlb.getSubnetName() | ||
| hasIPv6SubnetRange, err := utils.SubnetHasIPv4Range(l4netlb.cloud, subnetName, subnetExternalAccessType) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ditto: IPv6 on the left, IPv4 on the right
| @@ -236,6 +236,15 @@ func (l4netlb *L4NetLB) EnsureFrontend(nodeNames []string, svc *corev1.Service) | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| // If service requires IPv6 LoadBalancer -- verify that Subnet with External IPv4 ranges is used. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| // If service requires IPv6 LoadBalancer -- verify that Subnet with External IPv4 ranges is used. | |
| // If service requires IPv4 LoadBalancer -- verify that Subnet with External IPv4 ranges is used. |
| @@ -236,6 +236,15 @@ func (l4netlb *L4NetLB) EnsureFrontend(nodeNames []string, svc *corev1.Service) | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| // If service requires IPv6 LoadBalancer -- verify that Subnet with External IPv4 ranges is used. | |||
| if l4netlb.enableDualStack && utils.NeedsIPv6(svc) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| if l4netlb.enableDualStack && utils.NeedsIPv6(svc) { | |
| if l4netlb.enableDualStack && utils.NeedsIPv4(svc) { |
| @@ -215,3 +215,19 @@ func (l4 *L4) serviceSubnetHasInternalIPv6Range() error { | |||
| } | |||
| return nil | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| func (l4 *L4) serviceSubnetHasInternalIPv4Range() error { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is it even called anywhere?
| @@ -223,3 +223,19 @@ func (l4netlb *L4NetLB) serviceSubnetHasExternalIPv6Range() error { | |||
| } | |||
| return nil | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| func (l4netlb *L4NetLB) serviceSubnetHasExternalIPv4Range() error { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it's a bit strange to me that function serviceSubnetHasExternalIPv4Range instead of returning bool returns error
reading something like this
err := l4netlb.serviceSubnetHasExternalIPv4Range()
makes you think that error happens when something wrong happened, not when service just doesn't have ExternalIPv4Range
though, I am not strong on this opinion :)
| subnet, err := cloud.GetSubnetwork(cloud.Region(), subnetName) | ||
| func SubnetHasIPv6Range(gcecloud *gce.Cloud, subnetName, accessType string) (bool, error) { | ||
| key := meta.RegionalKey(subnetName, gcecloud.Region()) | ||
| subnet, err := gcecloud.Compute().AlphaSubnetworks().Get(context.Background(), key) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it only available in Alpha?
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lifecycle/stale
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
k8s-ci-robot
added
lifecycle/rotten
…om subnets of IPv4 services have correct address range