Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update logging in endpoint calculation. #2161

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2023

Conversation

sawsa307
Copy link
Contributor

@sawsa307 sawsa307 commented Jun 6, 2023

Update logging in endpoint calculation.
image
image

The way to trigger this is by constructing a custom endpoint slice so that we contains two endpoints from EPS that share the same pod but contains different endpointIP. The reason we are seeing this is because for this endpoint, the IP we use for network endpoint(and used for this check) is different from the IP from the endpoint in EPS.
image
The first IP we have is the endpoint IP from EPS, and the later one is the one we used for network endpoint.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 6, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sawsa307. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 6, 2023
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ func toZoneNetworkEndpointMapDegradedMode(eds []negtypes.EndpointsData, zoneGett
// endpoint address should match to the IP of its pod
checkIPErr := podContainsEndpointAddress(networkEndpoint, pod)
if checkIPErr != nil {
klog.Errorf("Endpoint %q in Endpoints %s/%s has IP(s) not match to its pod %s: %v, skipping", endpointAddress.Addresses, ed.Meta.Namespace, ed.Meta.Name, pod.Name, checkIPErr)
klog.Errorf("Endpoint %q in Endpoints %s/%s has IP(s) not match to its pod %s: %v, skipping", networkEndpoint.IP, ed.Meta.Namespace, ed.Meta.Name, pod.Name, checkIPErr)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Endpoint %q in Endpoints %s/%s has at least one IP that not match to its pod %s: %v, skipping

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated. Thanks!

@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ func podContainsEndpointAddress(networkEndpoint negtypes.NetworkEndpoint, pod *a
}
}
if matching != len(endpointIPs) {
return fmt.Errorf("%w: endpoint %v has IP(s) not match to its pod's IP(s)", negtypes.ErrEPIPNotFromPod, endpointIPs)
return fmt.Errorf("%w: endpoint has IP(s) %v not match to its pod's IP(s)", negtypes.ErrEPIPNotFromPod, endpointIPs)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reword: endpoint has at least one IP %v that does not match its pod's IP(s)

Update logging in endpoint calculation.
@swetharepakula
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 9, 2023
Copy link
Member

@swetharepakula swetharepakula left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sawsa307, swetharepakula

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 9, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 2e68b3c into kubernetes:master Jun 9, 2023
@sawsa307 sawsa307 deleted the update-logging branch September 2, 2023 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants