Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DRA: structured parameters #4381

Open
18 tasks done
pohly opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 50 comments
Open
18 tasks done

DRA: structured parameters #4381

pohly opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 50 comments
Assignees
Labels
sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status wg/batch Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG Batch. wg/device-management Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG Device Management.

Comments

@pohly
Copy link
Contributor

pohly commented Jan 4, 2024

Enhancement Description

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Jan 4, 2024
@pohly
Copy link
Contributor Author

pohly commented Jan 4, 2024

/sig node
/wg batch

The rationale behind creating a separate KEP is that this is an extension of DRA that (at least in theory) could graduate at its own pace. The KEP document itself also will be shorter, which will make discussing it easier.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. wg/batch Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG Batch. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 4, 2024
@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

/stage alpha
/milestone v1.30

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status label Jan 26, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.30 milestone Jan 26, 2024
@pohly pohly changed the title DRA: numeric parameters DRA: semantic parameters Jan 31, 2024
@klueska
Copy link
Contributor

klueska commented Feb 7, 2024

/milestone v1.30
/label lead-opted-in

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@klueska: You must be a member of the kubernetes/milestone-maintainers GitHub team to set the milestone. If you believe you should be able to issue the /milestone command, please contact your Milestone Maintainers Team and have them propose you as an additional delegate for this responsibility.

In response to this:

/milestone v1.30
/label lead-opted-in

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Member

@SergeyKanzhelev can we get this added to the 1.30 milestone?

@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Member

/label lead-opted-in

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release label Feb 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@klueska: Can not set label lead-opted-in: Must be member in one of these teams: [release-team-enhancements release-team-leads sig-api-machinery-leads sig-apps-leads sig-architecture-leads sig-auth-leads sig-autoscaling-leads sig-cli-leads sig-cloud-provider-leads sig-cluster-lifecycle-leads sig-contributor-experience-leads sig-docs-leads sig-instrumentation-leads sig-k8s-infra-leads sig-multicluster-leads sig-network-leads sig-node-leads sig-release-leads sig-scalability-leads sig-scheduling-leads sig-security-leads sig-storage-leads sig-testing-leads sig-windows-leads]

In response to this:

/milestone v1.30
/label lead-opted-in

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

/label lead-opted-in
/milestone v1.30

@salehsedghpour
Copy link

Hello @pohly 👋, Enhancements team here.

Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 02:00 UTC Friday 9th February 2024.

This enhancement is targeting for stage alpha for v1.30 (correct me, if otherwise)

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • KEP readme using the latest template has been merged into the k/enhancements repo.
  • KEP status is marked as implementable for latest-milestone: 1.30.
  • KEP readme has up-to-date graduation criteria
  • KEP has a production readiness review that has been completed and merged into k/enhancements. (For more information on the PRR process, check here).

For this KEP, we would just want to update the following but it's not required for alpha stage and it will serve for future stages:

The status of this enhancement is marked as At risk for enhancement freeze. Please keep the issue description up-to-date with appropriate stages as well, I couldn't find any related PR regarding this KEP in k/enhancements. Thank you!

@salehsedghpour salehsedghpour moved this to At Risk for Enhancements Freeze in 1.30 Enhancements Tracking Feb 8, 2024
@salehsedghpour
Copy link

With all the requirements fulfilled this enhancement is now marked as tracked for the upcoming enhancements freeze 🚀

@salehsedghpour salehsedghpour moved this from At Risk for Enhancements Freeze to Tracked for Enhancements Freeze in 1.30 Enhancements Tracking Feb 9, 2024
@pohly pohly changed the title DRA: semantic parameters DRA: structured parameters Feb 9, 2024
@drewhagen
Copy link
Member

Hello @pohly 👋, 1.30 Docs Lead here.

Does this enhancement work planned for 1.30 require any new docs or modification to existing docs?
If so, please follows the steps here to open a PR against dev-1.30 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Thursday February 22nd 2024 18:00 PDT.

Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release.
Thank you!

@hacktivist123
Copy link

Hello @pohly 👋 1.32 Docs Shadow here.

Does this enhancement work planned for 1.32 require any new docs or modifications to existing docs?
If so, please follow the steps here to open a PR against the dev-1.32 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Thursday, October 24th 2024 18:00 PDT.

Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release.
Thank you!

@hacktivist123
Copy link

Hello, @pohly 👋 1.32 Docs Shadow here.

This is just a reminder to open a placeholder PR against dev-1.32 branch in the k/website repo for this (steps available here) for this KEP if it requires new or modifications to existing docs:

The deadline for this is Thursday, Oct 24 at 18:00 PDT.
Thanks! 🚀

@pohly
Copy link
Contributor Author

pohly commented Oct 18, 2024

@hacktivist123: I already listed such a PR under "docs" in the issue description.

@hacktivist123
Copy link

Oh didn't see that, sorry!

Thanks @pohly

@edithturn
Copy link

edithturn commented Oct 28, 2024

Hello @pohly ! 🙂 👋

This is a reminder to author your feature blog post!

To opt-in, let us know and open a Feature Blog placeholder PR against the website repository by 30th Oct 2024. For more information about writing a blog see the blog contribution guidelines.

Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions!

Thank you very much!
Edith from the v1.32 Shadow Communications Team

@tjons
Copy link
Contributor

tjons commented Nov 4, 2024

Hey again @pohly 👋 v1.32 Enhancements team here,

Just checking in as we approach code freeze at 02:00 UTC Friday 8th November 2024 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 7th November 2024 .

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • All PRs to the Kubernetes repo that are related to your enhancement are linked in the above issue description (for tracking purposes).
  • All PR/s are ready to be merged (they have approved and lgtm labels applied) by the code freeze deadline. This includes tests.

For this enhancement, it looks like the following PRs are open and need to be merged before code freeze (and we need to update the Issue description to include all the related PRs of this KEP):

Additionally, please let me know if there are any other PRs in k/k not listed in the description or not linked with this GitHub issue that we should track for this KEP, so that we can maintain accurate status.

The status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for code freeze.

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you!

@tjons tjons moved this from Tracked for enhancements freeze to At risk for code freeze in 1.32 Enhancements Tracking Nov 4, 2024
@haircommander haircommander moved this from Tracked to Implemented in SIG Node 1.32 KEPs planning Nov 7, 2024
@tjons
Copy link
Contributor

tjons commented Nov 8, 2024

Hello @pohly 👋, Enhancements team here.

With all the implementation(code related) PRs merged as per the issue description:

This enhancement is now marked as tracked for code freeze for the 1.32 Code Freeze!

Please note that KEPs targeting stable need to have the status field marked as implemented in the kep.yaml file after code PRs are merged and the feature gates are removed.

@tjons tjons moved this from At risk for code freeze to Tracked for code freeze in 1.32 Enhancements Tracking Nov 8, 2024
@wzshiming
Copy link
Member

wzshiming commented Nov 11, 2024

The v1beta1.Device is the same name as the existing one. Maybe we should change the name?

kubernetes/kubernetes#128730 (comment)

@pohly
Copy link
Contributor Author

pohly commented Nov 19, 2024

/wg device-management

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the wg/device-management Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG Device Management. label Nov 19, 2024
@haircommander haircommander moved this from Implemented to Done in SIG Node 1.32 KEPs planning Dec 4, 2024
@haircommander haircommander closed this as completed by moving to Done in SIG Node 1.32 KEPs planning Dec 4, 2024
@haircommander
Copy link
Contributor

/reopen

A github workflow autoclosed when I set to done 🙃 sorry for the noise

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Dec 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@haircommander: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

A github workflow autoclosed when I set to done 🙃 sorry for the noise

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

Hello @pohly 👋, 1.33 Enhancements Lead here.

I’m closing milestone 1.32 now. If you'd like to work on this enhancement in v1.33, please have the SIG lead opt-in by adding the lead-opted-in label, which ensures it gets added to the tracking board. Also, please set the milestone to v1.33 using /milestone v1.33.
Thanks!

/remove-label lead-opted-in
/milestone clear

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed this from the v1.32 milestone Jan 12, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release label Jan 12, 2025
@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat removed the tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team label Jan 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status wg/batch Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG Batch. wg/device-management Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG Device Management.
Projects
Status: Tracked for Code Freeze
Status: 📋 Backlog
Status: Tracked for Doc Freeze
Status: Tracked for code freeze
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests