Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[occm] Remove filtering by device_owner. #2304

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2023

Conversation

gryf
Copy link
Contributor

@gryf gryf commented Jul 17, 2023

In OpenStack default AZ is called 'nova', thus device_owner is filled with 'compute:nova', and that's ok for deployments within one (default) AZ.

Filtering by device_owner however, will make function getAttachedPorts to return zero ports for provided node. In this patch, filtering by device_owner is simply removed.

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue this PR fixes(if applicable):
fixes #2303

Special notes for reviewers:

Release note:

NONE

In OpenStack default AZ is called 'nova', thus device_owner is filled
with 'compute:nova', and that's ok for deployments within one (default)
AZ.

Filtering by device_owner however, will make function getAttachedPorts
to return zero ports for provided node. In this patch, filtering by
device_owner is simply removed.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. label Jul 17, 2023
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jul 17, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: gryf / name: Roman Dobosz (c917e1e)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 17, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @gryf!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jul 17, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @gryf. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 17, 2023
@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Jul 17, 2023

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 17, 2023
@zetaab
Copy link
Member

zetaab commented Jul 17, 2023

interesting, we do have multiple AZs (any of them are not called nova) and we are not facing issues

Copy link
Member

@zetaab zetaab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Anyways the query against openstack api should be still quite fast. I do not see reason to not remove this.

/approve

@dulek opinions?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zetaab

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 17, 2023
@gryf
Copy link
Contributor Author

gryf commented Jul 17, 2023

@zetaab this issue manifests itself after transitions from nova os-interfaces to neutron calls - if you on 1.27, you'll not see this.

@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Jul 17, 2023

Anyways the query against openstack api should be still quite fast. I do not see reason to not remove this.

It was caused by #2250, we've just discovered this today when trying master on a cloud that has AZs.

The main reason I insisted to include this in the query was to foresee a situation when Nova isn't the only consumer of Neutron and we could have device_id populated with the server ID, but with different device_owner. Currently Nova's code will break such a use case anyway, as they don't check device_owner at all. It's safe to remove this, it was just me trying to make it too perfect. ;)

@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Jul 18, 2023

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 18, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a2c86f9 into kubernetes:master Jul 18, 2023
@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Jul 18, 2023

@mdbooth FYI

mandre pushed a commit to shiftstack/cloud-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2024
In OpenStack default AZ is called 'nova', thus device_owner is filled
with 'compute:nova', and that's ok for deployments within one (default)
AZ.

Filtering by device_owner however, will make function getAttachedPorts
to return zero ports for provided node. In this patch, filtering by
device_owner is simply removed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[occm] Cannot expose deployment while on different Availability Zone
4 participants