Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AWS: only cache instance requirements when needed #7383

Merged

Conversation

rrangith
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug
/kind regression

Fixes #7102

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR reduces the number of unneeded DescribeLaunchTemplateVersions API calls. Previously there was a PR that only looked for instance requirements when needed #5550. However this PR #6245 introduced a regression where now it looks for instance requirements all the time.

However in the original fix PR it was stated:

But retrieving InstanceRequirements should only be useful when the LT overrides don't already specify an InstanceType, as both are mutually exclusive. The api reference doc states:

If you specify InstanceRequirements, you can't specify InstanceType.

That mutual exclusion is already leveraged by getInstanceTypesForAsgs: we don't look for InstanceRequirements when we have a mixed instance policy specifying instance types overrides.

This PR makes it so we again only look for instance requirements if instance type overrides are not used.

The screenshot below shows the huge increase in DescribeLaunchTemplateVersions API calls when we upgraded our cluster autoscaler to include the bug PR at 16:00 #6245
Screenshot 2024-10-11 at 10 34 24 AM

The screenshot below is after I applied this fix at 10:30, and the DescribeLaunchTemplateVersions API calls dropped back down.
Screenshot 2024-10-11 at 11 10 22 AM

The screenshot below shows the main loop duration spiking when the bug was introduced after 15:00 and the duration returned to normal after my fix at 10:30
Screenshot 2024-10-11 at 11 13 38 AM

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

AWS: Only cache instance requirements when needed

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/regression Categorizes issue or PR as related to a regression from a prior release. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @rrangith. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/provider/aws Issues or PRs related to aws provider size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 11, 2024
@adrianmoisey
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 12, 2024
@gjtempleton
Copy link
Member

/assign @gjtempleton

@gjtempleton
Copy link
Member

Thanks for this
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gjtempleton, rrangith

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c9970a4 into kubernetes:master Nov 11, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/cluster-autoscaler area/provider/aws Issues or PRs related to aws provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/regression Categorizes issue or PR as related to a regression from a prior release. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cluster autoscaler more AWS DescribeLaunchTemplateVersions due to PR-6245
4 participants