Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cluster-autoscaler: support Brightbox image pattern #5764

Merged

Conversation

NeilW
Copy link
Contributor

@NeilW NeilW commented May 17, 2023

cluster-autoscaler/cloudprovider/brightbox

Allow scaled workers to be built from an image name pattern as well as an image id. This deals with long running clusters where the official image is updated with security changes over time.

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Add support for building new nodes using an image name as well as an ID. 

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. area/cluster-autoscaler labels May 17, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from feiskyer and x13n May 17, 2023 09:24
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 17, 2023
@NeilW NeilW force-pushed the brightbox-provider-additions branch from 85c1eb3 to 4391422 Compare May 17, 2023 09:28
cluster-autoscaler/cloudprovider/brightbox

Allow scaled workers to be built from an image name pattern as well as
an image id. This deals with long running clusters where the official
image is updated with security changes over time.
@NeilW NeilW force-pushed the brightbox-provider-additions branch from 4391422 to 0634543 Compare June 8, 2023 11:11
@NeilW
Copy link
Contributor Author

NeilW commented Jun 8, 2023

/area provider/brightbox

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@NeilW: The label(s) area/provider/brightbox cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

/area provider/brightbox

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Only set the registry value in the local Makefile if it is missing
Copy link
Contributor

@mwielgus mwielgus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 26, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mwielgus, NeilW

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 26, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 3248bf3 into kubernetes:master Jun 26, 2023
@NeilW NeilW deleted the brightbox-provider-additions branch October 25, 2023 12:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/cluster-autoscaler cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants