Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cluster-autoscaler: fix unit tests #4235

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2021

Conversation

bpineau
Copy link
Contributor

@bpineau bpineau commented Aug 2, 2021

Recent changes configured providers to set stable nodes labels names
exclusively (ie. LabelTopologyZone and not LabelZoneFailureDomain, etc),
with older labels names backfilled at nodeInfos templates generation time
(from GetNodeInfoFromTemplate), which isn't invoked from most tests cases.
GCE NodePirce() might have been dereferencing potentially missing labels.
And run hack/update-gofmt.sh where hack/verify-all.sh fails, to pass CI.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 2, 2021
@bpineau bpineau changed the title cluster-autoscaler: fix tests, fmt and GCE NodePrice cluster-autoscaler: fix unit tests Aug 3, 2021
Recent changes configured providers to set stable nodes labels names
exclusively (ie. LabelTopologyZone and not LabelZoneFailureDomain, etc),
with older labels names backfilled at nodeInfos templates generation time
(from GetNodeInfoFromTemplate), which isn't invoked from most tests cases.
GCE NodePirce() might have been dereferencing potentially missing labels.
And run hack/update-gofmt.sh where hack/verify-all.sh fails, to pass CI.
@bpineau bpineau force-pushed the fix-tests-and-gcp-pricing branch from 7be767b to 79c63a7 Compare August 3, 2021 06:29
Copy link
Member

@feiskyer feiskyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 3, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bpineau, feiskyer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 3, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c563a40 into kubernetes:master Aug 3, 2021
evansheng pushed a commit to airbnb/autoscaler that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2022
evansheng pushed a commit to airbnb/autoscaler that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2022
jiancheung pushed a commit to airbnb/autoscaler that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants