-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
kubectl kustomize version
should report version info
#2142
Comments
kubectl kustomize versopm
should report version infokubectl kustomize version
should report version info
as an aside - should you not prefer |
Should it be in |
It should probably be simply Regarding the name clash with a file named |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Expected behavior:
should print information about the version of Kustomize templates that
kubectl kustomize
accepts, similar to thekustomize version
commandActual behavior
doesn't work.
The kubectl command only accepts kustomize version 2+, but the main kustomize repo is on version 3+. This has caused some confusion for our users, because they thought that they should be using the "new way" of preferring
kubectl kustomize
overkustomize
Obviously, we could work around this by keeping a map from kubectl versions to compatible kustomize versions, but it would be nice if we could get this info from
kubectl kustomize
PS -- I also filed kubernetes/kubectl#797, but someone there commented that this belongs in the kustomize repo. I'm not totally clear on the relationship between kustomize team and the
kubectl
team, and whykustomize version
is in one but not the other. Happy to redirect conversation to the appropriate place!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: