Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix typo and duplicated declaration of ingressclasses #8591

Merged

Conversation

spaced
Copy link
Contributor

@spaced spaced commented Mar 2, 2022

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Fix typo and duplicated declaration of ingressclasses

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 2, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @spaced. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from EppO and oomichi March 2, 2022 13:47
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 2, 2022
@@ -16,15 +16,16 @@ rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["services"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch"]
- apiGroups: ["extensions","networking.k8s.io"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I expect this was in place for some beta API compatibility. Did you check the impact of removing the extensions apiGroup?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The stable API(networking.k8s.io) of ingress has been added since v1.19, and the beta API of ingress has been removed since Kubernetes v1.22 as https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-guide/#ingress-v122
On Kubespray, kube_version_min_required is v1.21.0.
So I think it is fine to remove this extensions.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @oomichi for the clarification!

verbs: ["get", "list", "watch"]
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["events"]
verbs: ["create", "patch"]
- apiGroups: ["extensions","networking.k8s.io"]
resources: ["ingresses/status"]
verbs: ["update"]
- apiGroups: [networking.k8s.io"]
- apiGroups: ["networking.k8s.io"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The list of verbs and apiGroups is the same as the one above. It looks cleaner to just group resources in the entry above and delete this typo'ed line.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is a nice point.
I agree with @cristicalin here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cristicalin @oomichi
nope, i do not agree: the one above is only for ingress/status and update.
I recommend to not reinvent the wheel and stay close to https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/blob/main/deploy/static/provider/baremetal/1.21/deploy.yaml#L209 for easier merge in the future.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your explanation, that makes sense for easy maintenance.

/ok-to-test
/lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@oomichi oomichi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/cc @oomichi

@@ -16,15 +16,16 @@ rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["services"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch"]
- apiGroups: ["extensions","networking.k8s.io"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The stable API(networking.k8s.io) of ingress has been added since v1.19, and the beta API of ingress has been removed since Kubernetes v1.22 as https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-guide/#ingress-v122
On Kubespray, kube_version_min_required is v1.21.0.
So I think it is fine to remove this extensions.

verbs: ["get", "list", "watch"]
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["events"]
verbs: ["create", "patch"]
- apiGroups: ["extensions","networking.k8s.io"]
resources: ["ingresses/status"]
verbs: ["update"]
- apiGroups: [networking.k8s.io"]
- apiGroups: ["networking.k8s.io"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is a nice point.
I agree with @cristicalin here

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from oomichi March 2, 2022 23:31
@cristicalin
Copy link
Contributor

ping @spaced

Could you please address the comments above so we can merge this contribution?

@spaced
Copy link
Contributor Author

spaced commented Mar 10, 2022

Could you please address the comment

i already commented, we should not

The list of verbs and apiGroups is the same as the one above.

this is not the same: it has resources: ["ingresses/status"]

I recommend to stay close what upstream provides: https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/blob/main/deploy/static/provider/baremetal/1.21/deploy.yaml#L209 for easier merge in the future.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 11, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 11, 2022
@cristicalin
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, I missed your comment @spaced , thanks for the explanation.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cristicalin, spaced

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 13, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 2b79be6 into kubernetes-sigs:master Mar 13, 2022
sakuraiyuta pushed a commit to sakuraiyuta/kubespray that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2022
@oomichi oomichi mentioned this pull request May 28, 2022
LuckySB pushed a commit to southbridgeio/kubespray that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
LuckySB pushed a commit to southbridgeio/kubespray that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2023
@spaced spaced deleted the fix-nginx-controller-clusterrole branch June 10, 2024 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants