Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prevent removing etcd member when running in check mode #8570

Merged

Conversation

fungusakafungus
Copy link
Contributor

@fungusakafungus fungusakafungus commented Feb 21, 2022

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
Fixes removing etcd node when running with --check. Before, running remove-node playbook on an etcd node with --check will happily remove the node. That's the opposite of how --check is supposed to work. This seems to be a copy-paste issue(introduced in https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray/pull/5009/files#diff-84b588aaf686ff2f99d525c4269b48f766a3bc074f4cb34bd381918a43fb2ab1R23-R54), so I'm also removing other irrelevant lines.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:
check_mode docs: https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/user_guide/playbooks_checkmode.html#enforcing-or-preventing-check-mode-on-tasks

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Prevent removing etcd member when running in check mode

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 21, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @fungusakafungus. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Feb 21, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 21, 2022
Copy link
Member

@floryut floryut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fungusakafungus rofl.. that's a weird bug indeed :/

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, fungusakafungus

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 22, 2022
@tjanson
Copy link
Contributor

tjanson commented Feb 22, 2022

There's a similar issue in the etcd cert generation:

My guess is that that's just a copy and paste error from the task immediately above, where ignoring check mode makes sense.

I checked the rest of the codebase (searched via rg 'check_mode:..*(false|no)'), and these two places seem to be the only ones that are problematic (i.e. the remaining tasks only safely gather info).

@fungusakafungus
Copy link
Contributor Author

There's a similar issue in the etcd cert generation:

I'll submit that fix separately

@cristicalin
Copy link
Contributor

Weird bug indeed.
Good find @fungusakafungus !

/ok-to-test
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 23, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 23, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f9b5e44 into kubernetes-sigs:master Feb 23, 2022
sakuraiyuta pushed a commit to sakuraiyuta/kubespray that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2022
@oomichi oomichi mentioned this pull request May 28, 2022
LuckySB pushed a commit to southbridgeio/kubespray that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
LuckySB pushed a commit to southbridgeio/kubespray that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants