Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix line-spacing in no_proxy.yml #6810

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2020
Merged

Fix line-spacing in no_proxy.yml #6810

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2020

Conversation

holmesb
Copy link
Contributor

@holmesb holmesb commented Oct 9, 2020

@hafe raised the fact that line-endings in no_proxy.yml are CRLF instead of LF.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.

  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please sign in with your organization's credentials at https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf to be authorized.
  • If you have done the above and are still having issues with the CLA being reported as unsigned, please log a ticket with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk: https://support.linuxfoundation.org/
  • Should you encounter any issues with the Linux Foundation Helpdesk, send a message to the backup e-mail support address at: [email protected]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Oct 9, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @holmesb. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 9, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from bozzo and EppO October 9, 2020 20:35
@floryut
Copy link
Member

floryut commented Oct 9, 2020

Nice catch @hafe

/ok-to-test
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 9, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, holmesb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 9, 2020
@EppO
Copy link
Contributor

EppO commented Oct 10, 2020

/check-cla
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 10, 2020
@holmesb holmesb force-pushed the fix_line_spaces_in_no_proxy branch from 8a2bf30 to 7728679 Compare October 10, 2020 10:27
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Oct 10, 2020
@LuckySB
Copy link
Contributor

LuckySB commented Oct 11, 2020

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 11, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 4cb5a4f into kubernetes-sigs:master Oct 11, 2020
erulabs added a commit to kubesail/kubespray that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2020
@erulabs
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray
49b541f 
* 'master' of https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray:
  change owner to root for bin_dir directory (kubernetes-sigs#6814)
  Modify imagepullpolicy (kubernetes-sigs#6816)
  fix: add tags for set facts nodelocaldns (kubernetes-sigs#6813)
  Make reset work for crio (kubernetes-sigs#6812)
  Added option to force apiserver and respective client certificate to … (kubernetes-sigs#6403)
  cleanup kubelet_deployment_type (kubernetes-sigs#6815)
  allow pre-existing floating IPs to be specified with k8s_master_fips (kubernetes-sigs#6755)
  Fix line-spacing in no_proxy.yml (kubernetes-sigs#6810)
  Fix handler naming issue for Kubeadm | kubelet (kubernetes-sigs#6803)
  Disable dashboard by default (kubernetes-sigs#6804)
  Chmod kubeconfig to avoid group-readable (kubernetes-sigs#6800)
  Update bunch of dependencies (kubernetes-sigs#6801)
  If no_proxy_exclude_workers is true, workers will be excluded from the no_proxy variable.  This prevents docker engine restarting when scaling workers. (kubernetes-sigs#6520)
LuckySB pushed a commit to southbridgeio/kubespray that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2021
@holmesb @LuckySB
Fix line-spacing in no_proxy.yml (kubernetes-sigs#6810)
1d33b05 
Signed-off-by: holmesb <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bozzo bozzo Awaiting requested review from bozzo

@EppO EppO Awaiting requested review from EppO

Assignees

@EppO EppO

@LuckySB LuckySB

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@holmesb @k8s-ci-robot @floryut @EppO @LuckySB