[2.23] Fix download retry when get_url has no status_code. (#10613) #10791
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
k8s-ci-robot
added
kind/bug
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
size/XS
…10613) * Fix download retry when get_url has no status_code. * Fix until clause in download role.
VannTen
force-pushed
the
fix/backport-10613
branch
from
201ec51 to
430e1cb
Compare
VannTen
changed the title
|
Thanks @VannTen |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
|
/cc @jayonlau @MrFreezeex |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: MrFreezeex, VannTen, yankay The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Backport of #10613 (fix #10494 which should be present in 2.23)
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: