-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
⚠️ Plugin phase 1.5 implementation #2060
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I just realized this has a +5% coverage 🎉 |
/cc @jmrodri |
@jmrodri: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: jmrodri. Note that only kubernetes-sigs members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
@jmrodri: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/hold Ongoing discussion about accepting this before or after v3.0.0, until thats it solved I'm holding to prevent a mistake-merge |
3cb9df6
to
e5eea91
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @Adirio,
I am very happy with all changes here. 🥇 I also tested them locally and I have only 1 observation. I do not think that we can close #1941 with this one. See: #2060 (comment)
Otherwise, it has my OK as well for we move forward.
/test pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-15-12 |
7eebe8b
to
09f047a
Compare
6571c31
to
6f0265e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
couple of nits. Main comment is there's this pattern of iterating over the commands, checking if they match and interface, trying to do something if they do, and skipping them if that fails. We should have a helper for that -- I think it'd make the code a lot clearer
25b76f6
to
fd52d3b
Compare
/lgtm can refactor later if we need to |
fd52d3b
to
29f646c
Compare
cb20ff2
to
25dcf06
Compare
Signed-off-by: Adrian Orive <[email protected]>
25dcf06
to
f2e1edb
Compare
All requested changes were done. It introduces a good value and is a blocker for we move forward with the other ideas such as #2015, https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/blob/master/designs/code-generate-image-plugin.md So, IMO we can move forward with and get it merged /lgtm too. |
/hold cancel |
Design doc
It would solve the following issues.
NOTE:
To ensure that all changes proposed here also works with the consumer (SDK), operator-framework/operator-sdk#4581 was created.