FIX: fix for controller-runtime 0.6.0 GetFieldIndexer().IndexField ctx param

[calmkart]

in [email protected] the FieldIndexer interface is

type FieldIndexer interface {
	// IndexFields adds an index with the given field name on the given object type
	// by using the given function to extract the value for that field.  If you want
	// compatibility with the Kubernetes API server, only return one key, and only use
	// fields that the API server supports.  Otherwise, you can return multiple keys,
	// and "equality" in the field selector means that at least one key matches the value.
	// The FieldIndexer will automatically take care of indexing over namespace
	// and supporting efficient all-namespace queries.
	IndexField(ctx context.Context, obj runtime.Object, field string, extractValue IndexerFunc) error
}

fix to add a context to IndexField method
just a small fix

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @calmkart!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @calmkart. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[calmkart]

/assign @camilamacedo86

[camilamacedo86]

It is true. Checked. 👍

/ok-to-test

[camilamacedo86]

@calmkart you need rebase with the master to get the CI fix. Could you please do that?

[camilamacedo86]

/lgtm cancel
/approve cancel

[camilamacedo86]

/hold cancel

[calmkart]

@calmkart you need rebase with the master to get the CI fix. Could you please do that?

done
PTAL, thanks

[calmkart]

@camilamacedo86

[camilamacedo86]

We need to the same for : docs/book/src/multiversion-tutorial/testdata/project/controllers/cronjob_controller.go

[calmkart]

done

[camilamacedo86]

/hold cancel

[camilamacedo86]

/approve
/lgtm

Tks for the contribution 👍

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: calmkart, camilamacedo86

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [camilamacedo86]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment