-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pass PROXY environment variables to nodes #275
Conversation
Hi @pablochacin. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs or kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for the PR @pablochacin
please change Implements issue #270
to Fixes #270
/priority important-longterm
/kind feature
/ok-to-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for the update @pablochacin
please squash the commits. this looks good, unless @BenTheElder has comments?
Done |
Signed-off-by: Pablo Chacin <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
[I think netlify fails because it doesn't merge the branch into master before building, so this PR branch doesn't contain the netlify configs...] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
thank you!
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, pablochacin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[manual merge due to bogus netlify failures] |
Hello, Same problem a bit later, the cluster is started, but looking at the logs (kind export logs) it says repeatedly that it's trying to pull a docker image, and failing ; I guess the docker service (inside the container) is not configured to use the proxy. Edit: after applying the proxy setting to the docker in the kind-control-plane container, the cluster is ready ! |
Yeah we could add the clusters IPs to this, it would take a bit of work to compute these. It also looks like instead users can set https://docs.docker.com/network/proxy/#configure-the-docker-client on the host side before kind creates any clusters. |
…etes-sigs#275) * Added rollout status to wait for keoscluster controller ready * clean code * added firstInstallation for secret keoscluster-registries * clean code * added firstInstalation validation * Update pkg/cluster/internal/create/actions/createworker/createworker.go Co-authored-by: stg <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Augusto <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: stg <[email protected]>
Fixes #270
Pass the environment variables HTTP_PROXY/HTTPS_PROXY from the host environment to the nodes, so that the docker running on the node could download images when running behind a proxy (see issue #136)
Signed-off-by: Pablo Chacin [email protected]