Conformance tests for HTTPRoute+Gateway HTTPS Listener

[dprotaso]

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
/kind test
/area conformance

What this PR does / why we need it:

There's no 'Core' conformance tests that validates the combination of a HTTPRoute with a Gateway HTTPS Listener.

There are other tests but they're 'Extended' and behind various feature flags

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

N/A

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[sunjayBhatia]

test passes w/ contour 👍🏽

looks like the gateway in use same-namespace-with-https-listener is only ever used otherwise in HTTPRouteRedirectPortAndScheme which as you say is blocked from being generally part of core since it has other extended features required

[michaelbeaumont]

LGTM, passes with Kuma

[dprotaso]

adding approvers
/assign @arkodg @mlavacca @sunjayBhatia

adding reviewers
/cc @LiorLieberman @michaelbeaumont @Xunzhuo

[frankbu]

LGTM

[dprotaso]

Conformance reviewers/approvers - can I get review please @arkodg @mlavacca @LiorLieberman @Xunzhuo

[arkodg]

/approve

thanks !

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: arkodg, dprotaso, frankbu, michaelbeaumont, sunjayBhatia

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• conformance/OWNERS [arkodg,sunjayBhatia]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[dprotaso]

@sunjayBhatia @mlavacca can you add an /lgtm

[sunjayBhatia]

/lgtm

[sunjayBhatia]

/lgtm

[dprotaso]

CI is being weird - resetting it by re-opening the PR