✨ Fix Webhook names for OpenStackMachineTemplate and OpenStackCluster

[tobiasgiese]

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR fixes the Webhook names for the OpenStackMachineTemplate and OpenStackCluster.
As this fix is only for the webhook names (i.e., ValidatingWebhookConfiguration.webhooks.name and MutatingWebhookConfiguration.webhooks.name), it should only be updated.

diff of kubectl kustomize

--- /tmp/without-fixed-names.yaml	2021-07-20 07:50:41.591885981 +0200
+++ /tmp/with-fixed-names.yaml	2021-07-20 07:52:11.807954324 +0200
@@ -7823,7 +7823,7 @@
       path: /mutate-infrastructure-cluster-x-k8s-io-v1alpha4-openstackcluster
   failurePolicy: Fail
   matchPolicy: Equivalent
-  name: default.openstackcluster.infrastructure.x-k8s.io
+  name: default.openstackcluster.infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io
   rules:
   - apiGroups:
     - infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io
@@ -7875,7 +7875,7 @@
       path: /validate-infrastructure-cluster-x-k8s-io-v1alpha4-openstackcluster
   failurePolicy: Fail
   matchPolicy: Equivalent
-  name: validation.openstackcluster.infrastructure.x-k8s.io
+  name: validation.openstackcluster.infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io
   rules:
   - apiGroups:
     - infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io
@@ -7917,7 +7917,7 @@
       path: /validate-infrastructure-cluster-x-k8s-io-v1alpha4-openstackmachinetemplate
   failurePolicy: Fail
   matchPolicy: Equivalent
-  name: validation.openstackmachinetemplate.infrastructure.x-k8s.io
+  name: validation.openstackmachinetemplate.infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io
   rules:
   - apiGroups:
     - infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io
@@ -8156,7 +8156,7 @@
       path: /mutate-infrastructure-cluster-x-k8s-io-v1alpha4-openstackcluster
   failurePolicy: Fail
   matchPolicy: Equivalent
-  name: default.openstackcluster.infrastructure.x-k8s.io
+  name: default.openstackcluster.infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io
   rules:
   - apiGroups:
     - infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io
@@ -8205,7 +8205,7 @@
       path: /validate-infrastructure-cluster-x-k8s-io-v1alpha4-openstackcluster
   failurePolicy: Fail
   matchPolicy: Equivalent
-  name: validation.openstackcluster.infrastructure.x-k8s.io
+  name: validation.openstackcluster.infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io
   rules:
   - apiGroups:
     - infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io
@@ -8247,7 +8247,7 @@
       path: /validate-infrastructure-cluster-x-k8s-io-v1alpha4-openstackmachinetemplate
   failurePolicy: Fail
   matchPolicy: Equivalent
-  name: validation.openstackmachinetemplate.infrastructure.x-k8s.io
+  name: validation.openstackmachinetemplate.infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io
   rules:
   - apiGroups:
     - infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io

Special notes for your reviewer:

1. Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.

TODOs:

• squashed commits
• if necessary:
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests

/hold

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @tobiasgiese. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[sbueringer]

/ok-to-test
/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer, tobiasgiese

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [sbueringer]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jichenjc]

/lgtm

[tobiasgiese]

had to rebase... could you please take a look again @sbueringer @jichenjc :)

[hidekazuna]

/lgtm

[sbueringer]

/lgtm
/hold cancel