-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 261
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ Change API for OpenStackMachine.Spec.Image #1796
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
f880446
to
46b1937
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-full-test |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-test |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-full-test |
2 similar comments
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-full-test |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-full-test |
the bastion instanceSpec gets wrong API: ---
apiVersion: infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io/v1alpha6
kind: OpenStackCluster
metadata:
name: clusterctl-upgrade-7iukbs
namespace: clusterctl-upgrade
spec:
allowAllInClusterTraffic: true
apiServerLoadBalancer:
enabled: true
bastion:
enabled: true
instance:
flavor: m1.tiny
image:
name: cirros-0.6.1-x86_64-disk |
I need to move |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-full-test |
af51881
to
4f7f45a
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-full-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the others lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/hold until I fix the bastion thing via #1822 |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-full-test |
/hold cancel |
76346ab
to
842679a
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-full-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
The kustomize patches could be optimized a bit but I don't want to hold this back just because of that 🙂
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dulek, EmilienM, lentzi90, stephenfin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
Right now, the image for an OpenStackMachine can be defined either its name via Spec.Image or via Spec.ImageUUID. Now we will use a single parameter which would be of type ImageFilter.
rebased |
/lgtm |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Right now, the image for an OpenStackMachine can be defined either
its name via Spec.Image or via Spec.ImageUUID.
Now we will use a single parameter which would be of type ImageFilter.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #1795
TODOs: