-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
E2e deployment logic refactor #1020
E2e deployment logic refactor #1020
Conversation
cc7cf0e
to
ae94c59
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
/assign @mboersma
ae94c59
to
a724144
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
This is good refactoring--should be more readable and maintainable. 💚
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ test-e2e-local: $(ENVSUBST) $(KUBECTL) $(GINKGO) ## Run e2e tests | |||
PULL_POLICY=IfNotPresent $(MAKE) docker-build | |||
MANAGER_IMAGE=$(CONTROLLER_IMG)-$(ARCH):$(TAG) \ | |||
$(ENVSUBST) < $(E2E_CONF_FILE) > $(E2E_CONF_FILE_ENVSUBST) && \ | |||
$(GINKGO) -v -trace -tags=e2e -focus="$(GINKGO_FOCUS)" -skip="${GINKGO_SKIP}" -nodes=$(GINKGO_NODES) --noColor=$(GINKGO_NOCOLOR) ./test/e2e -- \ | |||
$(GINKGO) -v -trace -tags=e2e -focus="$(GINKGO_FOCUS)" -skip="${GINKGO_SKIP}" -nodes=$(GINKGO_NODES) --noColor=$(GINKGO_NOCOLOR) -stream --progress ./test/e2e -- \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I often make this change (adding -stream -progress
) locally, so 👍.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
me too :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will make sure I include this in #1018 when I rebase :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: devigned The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Does some clean up in the e2e specs. I was working on adding the ability to add Windows to the LB tests and noticed we had two ways to create deployments and it wasn't easy to tweak the deployment to add the necessary Windows components. This was a way to consolidate some of that logic.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.
TODOs:
Release note: