-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 423
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
use protobuf content type instead of json for k8s client #760
use protobuf content type instead of json for k8s client #760
Conversation
Welcome @bhavi-koduru! |
Hi @bhavi-koduru. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/ok-to-test |
066c83a
to
b42a421
Compare
/lgtm |
/lgtm |
FYI - only these folks can approve currently Lines 1 to 5 in 90beff7
|
/lgtm /approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bhavi-koduru, jyotimahapatra The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This MR is a part of effort to elevate single eks cluster performance by migrating the EKS components to use protobuf instead of json.
Modify kubeconfig type to use content type application/vnd.kubernetes.protobuf instead of json for performance gain.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #