-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 807
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add pod disruption budget for csi controller #857
Conversation
Hi @vdhanan. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ spec: | |||
- name: socket-dir | |||
mountPath: /var/lib/csi/sockets/pluginproxy/ | |||
- name: csi-attacher | |||
image: k8s.gcr.io/sig-storage/csi-attacher:v3.0.0 | |||
image: k8s.gcr.io/sig-storage/csi-attacher:v3.1.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why we need to update the image version?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i didn't update it manually, so i'm assuming one of the make
recipes bumped the version. @wongma7 do you know why it was updated?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah probably make generate-kustomize. I double checked and this change makes the helm chart values.yaml match the kustomize, so it's a sound change
/approve |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1910
💛 - Coveralls |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: vdhanan, wongma7 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
fixes #512
What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
What testing is done?
manually tested with kustomize and helm