add a document separator for storageclass template file

[nvnmandadhi]

Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
not a new feature

What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
adds a document separator for storageclass template file

What testing is done?
tested using helm template

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @nvnmandadhi!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @nvnmandadhi. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1625

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 81.656%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 1623:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	1736
Relevant Lines:	2126

---

💛 - Coveralls

[georambo]

looks good to me. just encountered this as well.

[ayberk]

Thanks for your contribution! Can you also please update the chart version. Otherwise our release workflow fails. But you might want to wait for #756 first.

Fixes #750.

[nvnmandadhi]

thanks @ayberk, happy to help! yeah, will update the chart version after #756 is complete.

[ayberk]

/lgtm
/approve

I'm going to merge multiple chart changes and update the version. Thanks!

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ayberk, georambo, nvnmandadhi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [ayberk]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[nvnmandadhi]

/lgtm
/approve

I'm going to merge multiple chart changes and update the version. Thanks!

Sounds good, thank you @ayberk, I'm looking to work on more issues, could you suggest a task please?

[ayberk]

I'd keep an eye on good-first-issues :) Appreciate the help!