-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 807
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Arm overlay #653
Arm overlay #653
Conversation
Hi @ayberk. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
/retest |
/retest continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr |
@ayberk: The
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1374
💛 - Coveralls |
@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ spec: | |||
- --csi-address=$(ADDRESS) | |||
- --v=5 | |||
- --leader-election=true | |||
- --leader-election-type=leases |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we don't need this because the default changed to leases right? just checking
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or they removed the option an dit's leases only?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah they removed it and it's leases.
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ metadata: | |||
rules: | |||
- apiGroups: [""] | |||
resources: ["persistentvolumes"] | |||
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch", "update"] | |||
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch", "update", "patch"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did you test the helm install /kustomize command? like if I have helm installed a prevoius version them helm install this version, i would assume that helm is smart enough to delete/recreate this object.
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ayberk, wongma7 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
Maintenance
What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
Driver can't be deployed on arm instances because of non-multiarch sidecar images. This PR updates some of the sidecar images and adds an overlay with multiarch images.
What testing is done?
Manual testing on my cluster + e2e tests.