Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do not call ModifyVolume if the volume is already in the desired state #1741
Do not call ModifyVolume if the volume is already in the desired state #1741
Changes from all commits
0a1b70c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dumb Q: Is the extra trip to EC2 API worth it? What is being checked here that wasn't checked earlier?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you look at the
checkDesiredState
function, there is a comment above it explaining the potential eventual consistency concerns the previous maintainers implemented it for.Even if it really isn't necessary, I don't think this PR is the appropriate place to be tearing out such a check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: This chunk was a bit hard to read on first glance, could you add a comment or refactor this into a helper function?
Something Like "modifyVolumeIdempotencyCheck"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't that already what this function is? I don't think making a function that will never be reused is a good idea, I'll go with your second suggestion and add a comment unless there are other objections.