feat: support PVC annotation template for provisioner secret

[hoyho]

Provisioner can resolve templated per volume secret in storage class such as following example: csi.storage.k8s.io/provisioner-secret-name: ${pvc.annotations['example.com/foo_secret']}
The secret will be stored as metadata in annotations of PV, so it can find the secret OnDelete even the PVC was deleted

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:
Inconsistent usage of per volume secrets in storage class with parameter like csi.storage.k8s.io/provisioner-secret-name
We can support syntax like other API does
csi.storage.k8s.io/node-publish-secret-name: ${pvc.annotations['team.example.com/key']}

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1148

Special notes for your reviewer:
We can use original PVC object to resolve secret during provision and store it to PV's metadata.
Parameters on existing SC are immutable so the provisioner should compatible with previous version.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Added support for PVC annotations in `csi.storage.k8s.io/provisioner-secret-name` StorageClass parameters. For example: `csi.storage.k8s.io/provisioner-secret-name: ${pvc.annotations['xyz']}`.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @hoyho. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-csi member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[hoyho]

/assign @jsafrane @pohly
PTAL.

[jsafrane]

/ok-to-test

[jsafrane]

The PR looks good, however, it introduces a new feature (or a bugfix). Please file release note in the PR description to advertise it to our users / CSI driver vendors.

[jsafrane]

I updated the release note by myself.
/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hoyho, jsafrane

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jsafrane]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment