Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

csi-sanity: some controller and node tests cases try to create a volume, even if plugin has no create volume capability #214

Open
Levp-zadara opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

Comments

@Levp-zadara
Copy link

Brief:

I am developing a CSI plugin, and at first stages I do not provide dynamic volume provisioning API support (which is a valid plugin according to CSI spec). That is, my plugin does not advertise CREATE_DELETE_VOLUME Controller Service capability.
But, there are 3 test cases where csi-sanity still sends CreateVolumeRequest to Controller Server.


Tests output:

Summarizing 3 Failures:

[Fail] Node Service [It] should work 
/mnt/homes/levp/go/src/github.com/kubernetes-csi/csi-test/pkg/sanity/node.go:648

[Fail] Controller Service ValidateVolumeCapabilities [It] should fail when no volume capabilities are provided 
/mnt/homes/levp/go/src/github.com/kubernetes-csi/csi-test/pkg/sanity/controller.go:936

[Fail] Controller Service ValidateVolumeCapabilities [It] should return appropriate values (no optional values added) 
/mnt/homes/levp/go/src/github.com/kubernetes-csi/csi-test/pkg/sanity/controller.go:991

Test cases:

From node.go:648:

	It("should work", func() {
		name := UniqueString("sanity-node-full")

		// Create Volume First
		By("creating a single node writer volume")
		vol, err := s.CreateVolume(
			context.Background(),
			&csi.CreateVolumeRequest{
				Name: name,
				VolumeCapabilities: []*csi.VolumeCapability{
					{
						AccessType: &csi.VolumeCapability_Mount{
							Mount: &csi.VolumeCapability_MountVolume{},
						},
						AccessMode: &csi.VolumeCapability_AccessMode{
							Mode: csi.VolumeCapability_AccessMode_SINGLE_NODE_WRITER,
						},
					},
				},
				Secrets:    sc.Secrets.CreateVolumeSecret,
				Parameters: sc.Config.TestVolumeParameters,
			},
		)
		Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())

From controller.go:936:

		It("should fail when no volume capabilities are provided", func() {

			// Create Volume First
			By("creating a single node writer volume")
			name := UniqueString("sanity-controller-validate-nocaps")

			vol, err := c.CreateVolume(
				context.Background(),
				&csi.CreateVolumeRequest{
					Name: name,
					VolumeCapabilities: []*csi.VolumeCapability{
						{
							AccessType: &csi.VolumeCapability_Mount{
								Mount: &csi.VolumeCapability_MountVolume{},
							},
							AccessMode: &csi.VolumeCapability_AccessMode{
								Mode: csi.VolumeCapability_AccessMode_SINGLE_NODE_WRITER,
							},
						},
					},
					Secrets:    sc.Secrets.CreateVolumeSecret,
					Parameters: sc.Config.TestVolumeParameters,
				},
			)
			Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())

From controller.go:991:

		It("should return appropriate values (no optional values added)", func() {

			// Create Volume First
			By("creating a single node writer volume")
			name := UniqueString("sanity-controller-validate")

			vol, err := c.CreateVolume(
				context.Background(),
				&csi.CreateVolumeRequest{
					Name: name,
					VolumeCapabilities: []*csi.VolumeCapability{
						{
							AccessType: &csi.VolumeCapability_Mount{
								Mount: &csi.VolumeCapability_MountVolume{},
							},
							AccessMode: &csi.VolumeCapability_AccessMode{
								Mode: csi.VolumeCapability_AccessMode_SINGLE_NODE_WRITER,
							},
						},
					},
					Secrets:    sc.Secrets.CreateVolumeSecret,
					Parameters: sc.Config.TestVolumeParameters,
				},
			)
			Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())

IMO, these test cases should be skipped, when Controller service does not have CREATE_DELETE_VOLUME capability.

Thanks!

@msau42
Copy link
Collaborator

msau42 commented Oct 4, 2019

/kind bug
/help

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@msau42:
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor.

Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here.

If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed
by commenting with the /remove-help command.

In response to this:

/kind bug
/help

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. labels Oct 4, 2019
@ymmt2005
Copy link

ymmt2005 commented Oct 6, 2019

One more test case is in the test for NodeGetVolumeStats:

By("creating a single node writer volume")

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 4, 2020
@msau42
Copy link
Collaborator

msau42 commented Feb 1, 2020

/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 1, 2020
stmcginnis pushed a commit to stmcginnis/csi-test that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants