Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for terminal resize in ExecProcess #3801

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

Reimplements #3657 since that PR has gone idle.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 27, 2024
@brendandburns brendandburns changed the title Add support for terminal resize in ExecProcess [WIP] Add support for terminal resize in ExecProcess Nov 28, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 28, 2024
@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor Author

There's something wrong with the tests.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 5, 2024
@brendandburns brendandburns changed the title [WIP] Add support for terminal resize in ExecProcess Add support for terminal resize in ExecProcess Dec 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 5, 2024
@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, this should now be ready for review.

Copy link
Member

@yue9944882 yue9944882 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: brendandburns, yue9944882

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [brendandburns,yue9944882]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 8, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 8, 2024
@brendandburns brendandburns added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 8, 2024
@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor Author

self-lgtm, since the changes were just to address a rebase conflict.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 63fc77b into master Dec 8, 2024
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants